Dual RAS Flow Activated Sludge Wastewater Treatment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current wastewater treatment systems face challenges in efficiently managing variable pollutant concentrations, volume, and temperature of industrial and municipal sewage, particularly in maintaining optimal carbon to nitrogen ratios and inhibiting the anammox process due to high dissolved oxygen levels.

Innovation Solution

A two-stage or three-stage activated sludge wastewater treatment system is implemented, featuring flow equalization reactors, nitritation reactors, and anammox reactors, with controlled dissolved oxygen concentrations and return activated sludge flows to optimize nitrogen removal and carbonaceous BOD removal, utilizing a dual or triple RAS flow system to adjust return flow rates and maintain specific MCRT and DO levels.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional activated sludge systems are used to treat wastewater with variable pollutant concentrations, then the system can handle variable flows, but the carbon to nitrogen ratio becomes unoptimized and treatment efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment efficiencyVSAvoidcarbon to nitrogen ratio optimization
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system is divided into multiple reactors with specific functions: flow equalization reactors for carbonaceous BOD removal, nitritation reactors for ammonia oxidation, and anammox reactors for nitrogen removal. This segmentation allows each reactor to be optimized for its specific function, maintaining optimal carbon to nitrogen ratios even when influent varies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Flow equalization reactors perform preliminary treatment of carbonaceous BOD removal before the wastewater enters the nitritation and anammox reactors. This preliminary action stabilizes the carbon to nitrogen ratio upstream, ensuring optimal conditions for subsequent nitrogen removal processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If dissolved oxygen concentration is increased to enhance nitrification, then ammonia oxidation improves, but anammox bacteria are inhibited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveammonia oxidation rateVSAvoidanammox process stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system separates nitrification and anammox processes into distinct reactors with different dissolved oxygen conditions. Nitritation reactors operate with sufficient DO for ammonia oxidation, while anammox reactors operate at zero or very low DO to protect anammox bacteria, eliminating the trade-off between the two processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different dissolved oxygen concentrations are maintained in different reactors: nitritation reactors have higher DO levels optimized for ammonia-oxidizing bacteria, while anammox reactors have zero or very low DO levels optimized for anammox bacteria. Each reactor's local conditions are optimized for its specific biological process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Productivity

If traditional single-stage activated sludge systems are used, then the system structure is simple, but nitrogen removal efficiency and BOD removal efficiency cannot be optimized simultaneously

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenitrogen removal efficiencyVSAvoidsystem structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The treatment system is segmented into multiple functional stages: flow equalization for BOD removal, nitritation for ammonia oxidation, and anammox for nitrogen removal. This segmentation enables simultaneous optimization of both BOD and nitrogen removal efficiencies, achieving superior overall performance compared to single-stage systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The flow equalization reactors serve multiple functions: they equalize flow variations, remove carbonaceous BOD, and provide a carbon source for denitrification. This multi-functionality allows the system to achieve multiple treatment goals while managing complexity through integrated design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Reliability

If high return activated sludge flow rates are used to maintain biomass concentration, then sludge recycling improves, but oxygen transfer requirements and operational costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebiomass concentration maintenanceVSAvoidoxygen transfer requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the dissolved oxygen parameter in the anammox reactor to zero or very low levels, which fundamentally alters the biological process from aerobic nitrification to anaerobic anammox. This parameter change reduces oxygen transfer requirements and associated energy costs while maintaining effective nitrogen removal through the anammox reaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This system effectively achieves enhanced nitrogen removal and carbonaceous BOD removal by optimizing the growth of anammox bacteria, reducing oxygen transfer requirements and supplemental carbon source usage, while maintaining low nitrite and nitrate concentrations, thus improving treatment efficiency and operational costs.

Implementation Method 1

The anammox reactor is operated at zero or very low dissolved oxygen concentration to achieve nitrogen removal by deammonification

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAnammox (anaerobic ammonium oxidation):

Implementation Method 2

The nitritation reactor is operated as an aerobic reactor to achieve oxidation of ammonia nitrogen to nitrite nitrogen by biological nitritation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBiological nitritation: Oxidation

Implementation Method 3

The FEB reactor is operated as an anoxic reactor to achieve carbonaceous BOD removal; conversion of organic nitrogen to ammonia nitrogen; and, denitrification of recycled nitrite or nitrate nitrogen

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBiological denitrification: Reduction

Implementation Method 4

The system receives a mixed liquor flow from the anammox reactor in a clarifier

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSedimentation: Sedimentation

Data Source

PatentUS10351457B2Dual return activated sludge process in a flow-equalized wastewater treatment system
Publication Date: 2019.07.16 REID JOHN H
  • US10351457B2 patent drawing
  • US10351457B2 patent drawing
  • US10351457B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A common final clarifier is provided downstream of a two-stage or three-stage activated sludge (AS) system that includes: (A) one or more flow equalization basin (FEB) reactors and a nitritation reactor as the first AS stage, and an anammox reactor as the second AS stage, or (B) a carbonaceous biological oxygen demand (BOD) removal reactor and one or more FEBs as the first AS stage, a nitritation reactor as the second AS stage, and an anammox reactor as the third AS stage. A first return activated sludge (RAS) flow is conducted from the final clarifier to the first AS stage and a second segregated RAS flow is conducted to the second AS stage. Alternatively, a third segregated RAS flow is conducted to the third AS stage.