Dual Recommendation Engine Content Selection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current content distribution networks face challenges in dynamically selecting and providing personalized content to users based on their skill levels and interaction history, often resulting in inefficient content delivery and inadequate adaptation to user misconceptions.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing first and second recommendation engines within a content distribution network that selects next nodes and content based on user location, history, and guard conditions, leveraging statistical models to predict user responses and adapt content delivery, while also identifying and addressing user misconceptions through automated interventions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a single recommendation engine is used for content selection, then the system is simpler to manage, but it cannot adequately adapt to diverse user skill levels and misconceptions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptation to user skill levelsVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The recommendation system is divided into two specialized engines: a first recommendation engine that handles content selection based on user location and history, and a second recommendation engine that handles placeholder content selection. Each engine is optimized for its specific function, allowing the system to adapt to diverse user needs while maintaining manageable complexity through clear separation of concerns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The dual recommendation engine architecture provides universal adaptability across different user skill levels and content types. The system can handle both regular content selection and placeholder content selection through a unified dual-engine framework that adapts its behavior based on the specific requirements of each content selection scenario.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Productivity

If content delivery is highly personalized based on user history and skill level, then user engagement improves, but the computational requirements and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent delivery efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the content delivery process into distinct phases handled by different recommendation engines. The first engine handles the primary content selection based on user profiles and history, while the second engine handles placeholder content. This segmentation allows personalized content delivery without requiring a single overly complex system that processes all decisions centrally.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

User profiles, skill levels, and interaction histories are pre-processed and stored in the database before content selection occurs. The recommendation engines query these pre-processed data structures rather than computing everything in real-time, enabling personalized content delivery with reduced computational overhead during the actual content selection moment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If the system dynamically selects content based on multiple factors including guard conditions, then content relevance improves, but the selection process becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent selection precisionVSAvoidselection process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The content selection process is segmented into distinct evaluation stages: the first recommendation engine evaluates content based on user location and history, while guard conditions are separately evaluated against user profiles. The second recommendation engine handles placeholder content with its own set of conditions. This segmentation allows precise multi-factor evaluation without creating a monolithic complex selection process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different parts of the content network have different requirements and guard conditions. The system applies local quality control by evaluating specific conditions (such as prerequisite knowledge, skill level requirements) at each content node rather than applying a uniform complex evaluation framework everywhere. This allows precise content selection tailored to local requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS10614368B2System and method for content provisioning with dual recommendation engines
Publication Date: 2020.04.07 PEARSON EDUCATION INC
  • US10614368B2 patent drawing
  • US10614368B2 patent drawing
  • US10614368B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for content selection with first and second recommendation engines are disclosed herein. The system can include a memory include a content library database and a model database. The system can include a user device having a first network interface and a first I/O subsystem. The system can include one or more servers that can include a packet selection system and a presentation system. These one or more servers can: receive response data from the user device; provide received response data to a first recommendation engine; alert a second recommendation engine when a selected next node is a placeholder node; retrieve at least one statistical model relevant to selection of next node content; and select next node content based on an output of the at least one statistical model.