Dual-Robot Warehouse Retrieval for Multi-Level Shelf Access

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Manual management of inventory in warehouses is time-consuming and inefficient, necessitating an automated solution for loading and unloading inventory using robots.

Innovation Solution

A method involving two types of robots, where a first robot accesses and manages boxes on lower shelves and a second robot, taller and more complex, manages boxes on higher shelves, with adaptors that support boxes and facilitate efficient loading and unloading, allowing for automated retrieval and rearrangement of inventory.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single type of robot is used to access all shelves, then device complexity is reduced, but access time increases due to the need to reach higher shelves

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverobot type uniformityVSAvoidaccess time
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the warehouse shelving into two distinct zones: lower shelves accessible by compact first robots and higher shelves accessible by taller second robots. This segmentation allows each robot type to be optimized for its specific operational zone, reducing overall access time while maintaining manageable device complexity through specialized design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The solution introduces height as a differentiating dimension between robot types. First robots operate at lower heights for lower shelves, while second robots extend to higher heights for upper shelves. This dimensional differentiation resolves the time-complexity contradiction by matching robot capability to shelf height requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Loss of time

If a first robot moves beneath lower shelves to access boxes, then access time is reduced by over 50%, but device complexity increases due to the need for adaptors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess time for lower shelvesVSAvoidadaptor structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Adaptors serve as intermediary components installed on lower shelves to facilitate robot access. These adaptors provide standardized interfaces that enable first robots to efficiently retrieve boxes from beneath the shelves. The added complexity of adaptors is justified by the significant 50%+ reduction in access time they enable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Device complexity

If manual management of inventory is used, then device complexity is minimized, but productivity is low due to time-consuming operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation levelVSAvoidinventory management efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service automation where robots autonomously navigate the warehouse, locate boxes using identifiers, retrieve inventory, and return it to interfacing units. This eliminates manual labor while maintaining reasonable device complexity through standardized robot and adaptor designs, dramatically improving productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11574276B2Warehouse management, a robot and an adaptor
Publication Date: 2023.02.07 FIL ROBOTICS LTD
  • US11574276B2 patent drawing
  • US11574276B2 patent drawing
  • US11574276B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for retrieving content stored in a warehouse, the method may include: maintaining first content in boxes of a lowest shelf of a storage unit of the warehouse, while maintaining in boxes of higher shelves of the storage unit second content that is of less interest than the first content; accessing the boxes of the lowest shelf and providing the boxes to interfacing units, by a first robot; accessing the boxes of the higher shelves and providing the boxes to the interfacing units, by a second robot; wherein the first robot, when positioned at a lower position, is lower than a height of the lowest shelf; and wherein the second robot is higher than the height of the lowest shelf.