Dual SCR Region Emission Control for NOx Conversion and Slip Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) systems face a trade-off between NOx conversion efficiency and reductant slip, where high NOx conversion efficiency can lead to reductant storage on the catalyst, increasing the risk of reductant slipping through the exhaust tailpipe, while lower reductant injection decreases NOx conversion efficiency and allows NOx emissions.

Innovation Solution

Implementing multiple SCR regions in series, with reductant delivery adjusted based on the conditions of each region to optimize NOx conversion efficiency and reduce reductant slip, including monitoring storage capacity and temperature to select appropriate operating modes and using an oxidation catalyst to capture and convert slipped reductant.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If a large amount of reductant is injected, then NOx conversion efficiency is improved, but reductant slip increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveNOx conversion efficiencyVSAvoidreductant slip
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The SCR catalyst is divided into multiple regions (first SCR region and second SCR region) with different functions. The first region operates at higher temperature for rapid NOx conversion, while the second region operates at lower temperature for reductant storage and conversion of slipped reductant. This segmentation allows the system to achieve high NOx conversion efficiency while minimizing reductant slip by distributing the conversion function across multiple specialized zones.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Object-generated harmful factors

If a lesser amount of reductant is injected, then reductant slip is reduced, but NOx conversion efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereductant slipVSAvoidNOx conversion efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by injecting reductant upstream of the first SCR region where it can be rapidly converted to ammonia at high temperature. This preliminary conversion prevents reductant from reaching the tailpipe while the converted ammonia then flows to the second SCR region for further NOx conversion. This two-stage approach ensures complete NOx conversion while minimizing reductant slip.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Manufacturing precision

If multiple SCR regions are used with independent control, then performance is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveNOx conversion efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control functions for multiple SCR regions are merged into a single unified control system. Instead of independently controlling reductant delivery to each SCR region, the system uses one reductant injector upstream of the first SCR region and a single controller that manages both regions based on their respective conditions (temperature, storage capacity). This merging approach maintains the performance benefits of multiple regions while significantly reducing control system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach maintains high NOx conversion efficiency while minimizing reductant slip across a wider range of operating conditions without requiring independent control of reductant delivery to each SCR region, effectively balancing storage and conversion efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) systems may be used in a vehicle to facilitate reduction of engine output NOx by a reductant, such as urea or ammonia

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSelective catalytic reduction: Catalysis

Implementation Method 2

using an oxidation catalyst to capture and convert slipped reductant

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation: Oxidation

Implementation Method 3

a great amount of reductant may be stored on an SCR catalyst

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdsorption: Adsorption

Data Source

PatentUS8516798B2Methods and systems for control of an emission system with more than one SCR region
Publication Date: 2013.08.27 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US8516798B2 patent drawing
  • US8516798B2 patent drawing
  • US8516798B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems for controlling an emission control system of a vehicle having a first SCR region upstream of a second SCR region are provided herein. One exemplary method includes, in a first mode: adjusting an amount of reductant injected upstream of a first SCR region based on a condition of the first SCR region. The method may also include, in a second mode: adjusting the amount of reductant injected upstream of the first SCR region based on a condition of the second SCR region.