Dual-Sensor Parameterization for Stable Industrial Measurements

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing sensor parameterization methods in industrial processes often result in suboptimal measurement data quality due to static settings that fail to adapt to varying environmental conditions, leading to reduced performance across a broad application spectrum.

Innovation Solution

A method utilizing two sensors of the same kind, a configuration sensor and a productive sensor, where the configuration sensor acquires and transmits measurement data to a control unit to generate a dynamic parameter set for the productive sensor, allowing for real-time adaptation to changing boundary conditions, thereby optimizing measurement data quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If sensor parameters are set once for a broad application spectrum, then the sensor can handle various conditions, but the measurement data quality deteriorates under specific conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplication spectrumVSAvoidmeasurement data quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic parameter adjustment by continuously adapting sensor parameters based on real-time environmental conditions detected by the configuration sensor. This transforms the static parameter setting into a dynamic system that automatically optimizes measurement quality for current conditions while maintaining broad adaptability through automated adjustment mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes sensor parameters dynamically based on detected environmental conditions. The control unit receives data from the configuration sensor and automatically adjusts productive sensor parameters to optimize measurement quality for the current application context, resolving the contradiction between fixed parameters and varying conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If sensor parameters are optimized for specific conditions, then measurement data quality improves, but the sensor cannot handle other conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement data qualityVSAvoidapplication spectrum
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a feedback mechanism where the configuration sensor continuously monitors environmental conditions and feeds this information to the control unit, which then adjusts the productive sensor parameters accordingly. This closed-loop system maintains high measurement quality across different conditions by automatically adapting parameters based on real-time feedback about the current application context.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-adjustment through automated parameter optimization based on environmental detection. The configuration sensor and control unit work together to automatically configure the productive sensor for optimal performance without manual intervention, enabling the sensor to serve multiple applications while maintaining high measurement quality through self-service parameter adaptation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If dynamic parameter adjustment is implemented, then measurement data quality improves for current conditions, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement data qualityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a configuration sensor as an intermediary that detects environmental conditions and provides data to the control unit for parameter adjustment. This intermediary component enables dynamic parameter optimization without requiring complex direct sensing and control mechanisms within the productive sensor itself, distributing system complexity across specialized components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the sensor system into distinct functional components: a configuration sensor for environmental detection, a control unit for parameter optimization, and a productive sensor for measurement. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently and simplifies the overall system architecture by dividing the complex task of adaptive parameter adjustment across specialized modules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11262716B2Method for the parameterization of a sensor
Publication Date: 2022.03.01 SICK AG
  • US11262716B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for the dynamic parameterization of at least one sensor in an industrial process in whichmeasurement data of the process are acquired by means of a configuration sensor and of a productive sensor, with the configuration sensor and the productive sensor being sensors of the same kind;the measurement data are transmitted to a control unit;the control unit generates a parameter set for the productive sensor with reference to the measurement data and transmits the parameter set to the productive sensor; andthe productive sensor uses the parameter set in operation.