Dual-Sequence Tooth Body for Quiet Overload Blocking

1Reliability

If the teeth of both sequences are arranged offset and both engage during normal operation, then the blocking function is ensured, but noise level increases and smooth running deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:

Improveblocking functionVSAvoidnoise level

Core Design Contradiction:

ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The tooth-bearing body is segmented into two distinct sequences of teeth with different functions: the first sequence (larger teeth) handles normal operational engagement, while the second sequence (smaller teeth) is reserved exclusively for blocking functions during overload conditions. This segmentation allows each sequence to be optimized for its specific purpose, reducing noise during normal operation while maintaining reliability for blocking.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different local qualities are assigned to the two sequences: the first sequence features larger teeth with softer tooth casings for smooth, quiet engagement during normal operation, while the second sequence has smaller, harder teeth positioned to engage only under overload conditions for blocking. This local differentiation resolves the contradiction by making each sequence specialized for its function.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If both sequences of teeth engage during normal operation, then the blocking function is ensured, but smooth running deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:

Improveblocking functionVSAvoidsmooth running

Core Design Contradiction:

ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The tooth-bearing body is segmented into two distinct sequences of teeth with different functions: the first sequence (larger teeth) handles normal operational engagement, while the second sequence (smaller teeth) is reserved exclusively for blocking functions during overload conditions. This segmentation allows each sequence to be optimized for its specific purpose, reducing noise during normal operation while maintaining reliability for blocking.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different local qualities are assigned to the two sequences: the first sequence features larger teeth with softer tooth casings for smooth, quiet engagement during normal operation, while the second sequence has smaller, harder teeth positioned to engage only under overload conditions for blocking. This local differentiation resolves the contradiction by making each sequence specialized for its function.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #3Local quality

3Object-affected harmful factors

If the teeth of the second sequence are made softer to reduce noise, then noise level decreases, but the blocking function deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:

Improvenoise levelVSAvoidblocking function

Core Design Contradiction:

Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Different local qualities are assigned to the two sequences: the first sequence features larger teeth with softer tooth casings for smooth, quiet engagement during normal operation, while the second sequence has smaller, harder teeth positioned to engage only under overload conditions for blocking. This local differentiation resolves the contradiction by making each sequence specialized for its function.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The tooth-bearing body is segmented into two distinct sequences of teeth with different functions: the first sequence (larger teeth) handles normal operational engagement, while the second sequence (smaller teeth) is reserved exclusively for blocking functions during overload conditions. This segmentation allows each sequence to be optimized for its specific purpose, reducing noise during normal operation while maintaining reliability for blocking.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #1Segmentation

4Strength

If the teeth of the first sequence are made harder to increase strength, then strength increases, but noise level increases

Engineering Contradiction:

Improvetooth strengthVSAvoidnoise level

Core Design Contradiction:

StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Different local qualities are assigned to the two sequences: the first sequence features larger teeth with softer tooth casings for smooth, quiet engagement during normal operation, while the second sequence has smaller, harder teeth positioned to engage only under overload conditions for blocking. This local differentiation resolves the contradiction by making each sequence specialized for its function.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The teeth of the first sequence are constructed as composite structures with a tooth core and a tooth casing made of different materials with different hardness levels. The softer tooth casing reduces noise during engagement while the underlying tooth core provides structural strength, resolving the contradiction between strength and noise.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #40Composite materials

Dual-Sequence Tooth Body for Quiet Overload Blocking

Solution Overview

Problem

Innovation Solution

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

Solution Approach 1:

Solution Approach 2:

2Reliability

Solution Approach 1:

Solution Approach 2:

3Object-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Solution Approach 2:

4Strength

Solution Approach 1:

Solution Approach 2:

Data Source

AI summary