Dual-Server IoT Architecture for Data-Driven Building Climate Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional IoT architectures for building climate control lack integration of low-energy technologies and do not allow for comprehensive experimentation or data-driven operations, limiting their ability to optimize energy efficiency and indoor environmental conditions.

Innovation Solution

A dual-system IoT architecture that includes a rule-based server for operation control and a data-driven server for predictive modeling and optimization, integrated with various sensors and actuators, allowing for data acquisition, management, and separate commanding mechanisms to test and implement learning algorithms across multiple zones or the entire building.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional IoT architecture is used for building climate control, then system simplicity is maintained, but integration capability of low-energy technologies and experimentation capability are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintegration capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system is divided into two independent servers: a rule-based server for operational control and a data-driven server for predictive modeling and experimentation. This segmentation allows each server to specialize in specific functions, enabling integration of complex low-energy technologies while maintaining manageable system operation through clear functional separation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The dual-server architecture provides multi-functionality by enabling both traditional rule-based control operations and advanced data-driven experimentation simultaneously. The system can handle diverse low-energy technologies (TABS, natural ventilation, geothermal) through a unified platform that supports multiple control paradigms, making it universally applicable to various building configurations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Productivity

If rule-based control is used, then operational reliability is maintained, but energy optimization and adaptive control capabilities are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The data-driven server acts as an intermediary between sensor data and control actions, providing predictive modeling and optimization recommendations. It processes operational data to generate optimized control commands that are then executed by the rule-based server, enabling energy efficiency improvements while maintaining the stability of the underlying rule-based control system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The data-driven server performs preliminary analysis and predictive modeling of building performance before control actions are executed. By pre-processing data and predicting optimal control strategies in advance, the system can improve energy efficiency while the rule-based server ensures reliable execution of control actions based on established rules

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Loss of energy

If integrated low-energy technologies are deployed, then energy consumption is reduced, but control complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumptionVSAvoidcontrol complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into rule-based and data-driven components, each handling specific aspects of controlling integrated low-energy technologies. The rule-based server manages straightforward control logic while the data-driven server handles complex optimization for technologies like TABS and natural ventilation, reducing the control complexity burden on any single component

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements comprehensive feedback loops where sensors continuously monitor building performance and feed data to both servers. The data-driven server uses this feedback for predictive modeling and optimization, while the rule-based server uses it for real-time control adjustments, enabling effective management of integrated low-energy technologies through multi-layered feedback mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250102177A1Building as an Instrumentation for Data-Driven Building Operation
Publication Date: 2025.03.27 PRESIDENT & FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE
  • US20250102177A1 patent drawing
  • US20250102177A1 patent drawing
  • US20250102177A1 patent drawing

AI summary

There is provided a system for environmental control in a building. The system includes a plurality of sensors including operational sensors and data gathering sensors, and a plurality of actuators. The system also includes a rule-based server and a data-driven server coupled to the plurality of sensors and the plurality of actuators. The rule-based server receives operation signals from the operational sensors, and control operation of the plurality of actuators according to one or more rules based on the operation signals. The data-driven server receives or monitors data signals from the data-gathering sensors and the operation signals from the operational sensors, trains and/or applies data-driven models to the data signals and the operation signals to predict performance changes in the building due to a command. In accordance with a determination that the performance changes meet a predetermined criteria, the data-driven server controls operations of the plurality of actuators according to the command.