Dual-Shaft Preconditioner with Independent Variable Speed Drives

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional preconditioners lack flexibility in processing different materials due to fixed rotational speed differentials and residence times, which limits their ability to handle varying ingredients and flow rates, particularly in pet food and aquatic feed production where anti-nutritional factors need to be destroyed effectively.

Innovation Solution

Dual shaft preconditioners with variable drive mechanisms allow independent control of rotational speeds and retention times, enabling flexible operation and enhanced mixing efficiency through a digital control system and load cells for precise material handling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional preconditioners use fixed rotational speed differentials between mixing shafts, then the device structure is simple, but the adaptability to process different materials with varying ingredients and flow rates is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to process different materialsVSAvoiddevice structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the rotational speeds of the mixing shafts variable and independently controllable. Each shaft is equipped with its own variable speed drive mechanism, allowing the rotational speeds to be adjusted dynamically based on the specific material being processed. This transforms the fixed-speed system into a flexible, adaptive system that can optimize mixing parameters for different pet food formulations without requiring complex mechanical reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements parameter changes by allowing independent adjustment of rotational speed parameters for each mixing shaft. The control system enables modification of speed ratios between shafts based on material characteristics, ingredient composition, and desired residence time. This parameter flexibility resolves the contradiction by providing adaptability through software/control-based adjustments rather than hardware complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If conventional preconditioners use fixed residence times, then the device operation is simple, but the ability to effectively destroy anti-nutritional factors in plant protein sources requires variable residence times

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to destroy anti-nutritional factorsVSAvoidoperation simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by enabling variable residence time control through independent shaft speed adjustment. The system can dynamically modify the residence time of materials in the mixing chambers by changing rotational speeds in real-time. This allows optimization of heat treatment conditions to effectively destroy anti-nutritional factors in plant proteins while maintaining simple operation through automated control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback through a control system that monitors processing conditions and adjusts shaft speeds accordingly. The system can respond to material characteristics and processing requirements, automatically optimizing residence time to achieve effective destruction of anti-nutritional factors. This feedback mechanism provides adaptability without requiring complex manual operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If conventional preconditioners use identical mixing chambers with equal cross-sectional areas, then the device structure is simple, but the mixing efficiency and processing flexibility are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemixing efficiencyVSAvoidchamber configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry by configuring mixing chambers with different cross-sectional areas rather than identical chambers. This asymmetric design allows each chamber to be optimized for specific mixing functions, improving overall mixing efficiency. The different chamber sizes create varied flow patterns and residence time distributions that enhance material processing while maintaining relatively simple device structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements local quality by giving each mixing chamber distinct characteristics through different cross-sectional areas. Each chamber can be tailored to specific processing requirements, with larger chambers providing longer residence time for thorough mixing and smaller chambers enabling faster processing. This localized optimization improves productivity without requiring complex overall device configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Productivity

If conventional preconditioners rotate mixing shafts at fixed speeds, then the device structure is simple, but the Specific Mechanical Energy (SME) values and starch gelatinization are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestarch gelatinization efficiencyVSAvoiddrive mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by replacing fixed-speed drives with variable speed drive mechanisms for each mixing shaft. This allows the rotational speeds to be dynamically adjusted to optimize Specific Mechanical Energy input and starch gelatinization efficiency. The dynamic speed control enables the system to adapt to different material properties and processing requirements, achieving higher productivity through controlled mechanical energy input rather than structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements parameter changes by enabling independent adjustment of rotational speed parameters for each shaft. The control system can modify speed, torque, and power parameters to optimize SME values and starch gelatinization. This parameter flexibility achieves improved productivity through software-based control rather than mechanical complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP2591848B1Improved preconditioner having independently driven high-speed mixer shafts
Publication Date: 2014.10.01 WENGER MANUFACTURING INC
  • EP2591848B1 patent drawingFigure 1~5
  • EP2591848B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP2591848B1 patent drawingFigure 6~7

AI summary

An improved, dual-shaft preconditioner (10, 70, 102) is provided having independent drive mechanisms (18, 20, 78, 80) operatively coupled with a corresponding preconditioner shaft (14, 16, 74, 76, 106, 108) and permitting selective rotation of the shafts (14, 16, 74, 76, 106, 108) at rotational speeds and directions independent of each other. Preferably, the speed differential between the shafts (14, 16, 74, 76, 106, 108) is at least about 5:1. The mechanisms (18, 20, 78, 80) are operatively coupled with a digital control device (60) to allow rotational speed and direction control. Preferably, the preconditioner (10, 70, 102) is supported on load cells (62, 100) also coupled with control device (60) to permit on-the-go changes in material retention time within the pre-conditioner (10, 70, 102). The pre-conditioner (10, 70, 102) is particularly useful for the preconditioning and partial gelatinization of starch-bearing feed or food materials, to an extent to achieve at least about 50% cook in the preconditioned feed or food materials.