Dual Shaker Vibration Testing System with Segmented Frequency Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional vibration testing shakers are limited in their ability to apply a wide range of vibration frequencies effectively, particularly in generating sufficient output force across varying object masses, with hydraulic shakers lacking at high frequencies, electrodynamic shakers consuming excessive power, and piezo-electric actuators struggling at low frequencies.

Innovation Solution

A dual-shaker system is employed, where a piezo-electric shaker generates high-frequency vibrations (400-2000 Hz) and a hydraulic or electrodynamic shaker provides low-frequency vibrations (5-400 Hz), with a single accelerometer controlling both to ensure proportional force application across a wide frequency range.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If hydraulic shakers are used for vibration testing, then they can generate high output force at low frequencies, but they are not capable of generating vibration at relatively high frequencies (greater than about 300 Hz)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoutput vibration forceVSAvoidvibration frequency
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The vibration testing system is segmented into two separate shaker systems: a hydraulic shaker for low-frequency high-force generation (5-300 Hz) and an electrodynamic shaker for high-frequency vibration generation (300-2000 Hz). Each shaker operates within its optimal frequency range, eliminating the compromise required by single-system approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Force

If electrodynamic shakers are used to generate high output force at relatively high frequencies, then sufficiently high output force can be achieved, but with attendant high electrical power consumption and associated expense

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoutput vibration forceVSAvoidelectrical power consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the frequency and force generation tasks between two specialized shakers. The hydraulic shaker handles low-frequency high-force requirements efficiently without excessive power consumption, while the electrodynamic shaker handles only the high-frequency portion where it is most efficient, minimizing overall power consumption compared to using electrodynamic shakers across the entire frequency range.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Force

If piezo-electric actuators are used to produce high output force at relatively high vibration frequencies, then sufficiently high output force can be achieved, but they have limited ability to generate that same level of force at relatively low vibration frequencies (less than about 200 Hz)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoutput vibration forceVSAvoidvibration frequency
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the frequency spectrum into two segments: the hydraulic shaker covers the low-frequency range (5-300 Hz) where piezo-electric actuators are ineffective, and the electrodynamic shaker covers the high-frequency range (300-2000 Hz) where piezo-electric actuators are limited. This segmentation allows each system to operate in its optimal performance zone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Adaptability or versatility

If a single shaker system is used for vibration testing, then the device complexity is lower, but the ability to apply a wide range of vibration frequencies effectively is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefrequency range coverageVSAvoidshaker system configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The vibration testing system is segmented into two independent shaker systems with distinct frequency ranges. The hydraulic shaker handles 5-300 Hz while the electrodynamic shaker handles 300-2000 Hz, creating a segmented approach that achieves wide frequency coverage (5-2000 Hz) while allowing each subsystem to be optimized for its specific range, managing overall complexity through functional division.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The dual-shaker configuration creates a universal vibration testing system that can effectively handle both low-frequency and high-frequency testing requirements within a single integrated setup, making the system adaptable to a wide variety of testing scenarios across different frequency ranges and force requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration enables effective vibration testing of objects across a broad frequency range (5-2000 Hz) with sufficient force, addressing the limitations of conventional shakers by combining forces and optimizing power usage.

Implementation Method 1

a piezo-electric shaker generates high-frequency vibrations (400-2000 Hz)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPiezoelectric effect: Piezoelectric Effect

Implementation Method 2

a hydraulic or electrodynamic shaker provides low-frequency vibrations (5-400 Hz)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic force transmission: Hydraulic Press

Implementation Method 3

a hydraulic or electrodynamic shaker provides low-frequency vibrations (5-400 Hz)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic force: Lorentz Force

Data Source

PatentUS8408066B1High force vibration testing with wide frequency range
Publication Date: 2013.04.02 NATIONAL TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS OF SANDIA LLC
  • US8408066B1 patent drawing
  • US8408066B1 patent drawing
  • US8408066B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A shaker assembly for vibration testing includes first and second shakers, where the first shaker includes a piezo-electric material for generating vibration. A support structure permits a test object to be supported for vibration of the test object by both shakers. An input permits an external vibration controller to control vibration of the shakers.