Dual Sheet Feeder System for High-Speed Printing Reliability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

High-speed printing systems face challenges in reliable sheet feeding due to the limitations of existing sheet separators, which often require sophisticated and costly pneumatic systems, leading to increased costs, space requirements, power consumption, and noise, while also struggling with sheet misfeeds and double-feeds, especially when handling different sizes and types of print media.

Innovation Solution

A dual sheet feeder system that alternately feeds sheets from opposite sides of the same stack, allowing for adjustable feeding paths and repositionable feeders to accommodate various sheet sizes, reducing the need for complex and expensive pneumatic systems by using lower-cost retard type feeders, and enabling consistent media feeding with longer acquisition times.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a single low cost friction retard type sheet feeder is used to feed sheets from the same stack at high speed, then printing productivity is improved, but sheet feeding reliability deteriorates due to misfeeds, double-feeds, and skipped printing pitches

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprinting speedVSAvoidsheet feeding reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The sheet feeding system is segmented into two separate feeders (first sheet feeder and second sheet feeder) that operate alternately from the same stack. Each feeder handles a portion of the feeding task, allowing the system to maintain high productivity while each individual feeder operates at a reliable speed, thus avoiding misfeeds and double-feeds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The two sheet feeders operate in an alternating periodic manner, with the first feeder feeding a sheet, then the second feeder feeding the next sheet, and so on. This periodic operation allows each feeder to acquire sheets at a reliable rate while maintaining an overall high feeding speed that matches the printer's productivity requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Loss of time

If pneumatic sheet separator/feeders are used to achieve high speed sheet feeding, then sheet acquisition time is reduced, but device complexity and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesheet acquisition timeVSAvoidpneumatic system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sheet feeding function is divided between two simpler friction retard feeders operating alternately, eliminating the need for a single complex pneumatic system. Each feeder uses simple friction-based separation, and together they achieve the required sheet acquisition rate without pneumatic complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses inexpensive friction retard feeders instead of expensive pneumatic feeders. While individual friction feeders are slower, the alternating operation of two such feeders achieves the required speed using much cheaper, simpler components that do not require pneumatic infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Adaptability or versatility

If sheets are fed from different sheet stacks for the same print job, then feeding different sheet types is enabled, but operator error increases and consistency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesheet type flexibilityVSAvoidfeeding consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of feeding from multiple stacks (the conventional approach), the system inverts the approach by feeding from a single stack using two alternating feeders. This ensures all sheets come from the same consistent source, eliminating operator errors related to loading different sheet types, while still providing the flexibility to handle various sheet sizes through the adjustable feeders.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enhances sheet feeding reliability and reduces costs by allowing for efficient feeding of different sheet sizes and types from a single tray, minimizing misfeeds and double-feeds, while maintaining high printing productivity and customer satisfaction.

Implementation Method 1

friction retard feeders

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS7540484B2System of opposing alternate higher speed sheet feeding from the same sheet stack
Publication Date: 2009.06.02 XEROX CORP
  • US7540484B2 patent drawing
  • US7540484B2 patent drawing
  • US7540484B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In a printing system in which the print media sheets are alternately fed from the same stack in the same tray by two sheet feeders at opposite sides into different sheet paths, at least one of the sheet feeders is repositionable towards and away from the other for feeding different size sheets, and the connecting sheet path is repositionable with the repositioning of the sheet feeder. The repositioning of the sheet feeder and its associated sheet path may be automatic in coordination with the normal resetting of a tray stack edge guide with the loading of different size sheets into the tray. The enhanced rate sheet feeding may be for a dual print engine printing system and/or selectably common or reversed sheet facing. Alternating coordinated lifting of a nudger roll of one sheet feeder with operation of the opposing sheet feeder, and retard nips spaced from the stack, may be provided.