Dual Shutter Portions for Complete Camera Lens Blocking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional cameras lack effective mechanisms to prevent undesired viewing and recording, as they often rely on user intervention with materials like tape to block the camera view.

Innovation Solution

A camera shutter system with two shutter portions on opposite sides of the camera lens, affixed to pivoting axes and rotating shutter arms, which move to be contiguous in front of the camera lens, providing a secondary view-blocking mechanism.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a single shutter is used to block the camera view, then the structure is simple, but the blocking reliability is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblocking reliabilityVSAvoidshutter structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The shutter system is divided into two separate shutter portions positioned on opposite sides of the camera lens. Each shutter portion can be independently actuated by its own shutter arm, allowing the system to achieve complete blocking through the combined action of multiple segmented components rather than relying on a single complex shutter mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The shutter portions are designed with overlapping coverage areas that nest together when closed. The second shutter portion complements the first by covering any potential gaps or blind spots, creating a nested arrangement where multiple layers of blocking work together to ensure complete view obstruction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Ease of operation

If conventional view blocking methods (tape, covers) are used, then the device complexity is low, but the ease of operation is poor and reliability is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshutter operation easeVSAvoidshutter mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The shutter system transitions from static blocking methods (tape, fixed covers) to a dynamic mechanism where shutter arms can be actuated to move shutter portions between open and closed positions. This dynamic capability allows the system to adapt to different operational states while maintaining simplicity through automated or manual actuation mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The shutter mechanism is designed to be self-actuating through the coordinated movement of shutter arms that rotate about pivoting axes. The mechanical linkage and motorized actuation (where applicable) allow the system to control its own blocking state without requiring external intervention, improving ease of operation while managing complexity through integrated control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12306529B2Camera shutter with additional view blockers
Publication Date: 2025.05.20 BIAMP SYST LLC
  • US12306529B2 patent drawing
  • US12306529B2 patent drawing
  • US12306529B2 patent drawing

AI summary

One example may include a camera with a camera lens, and two shutter portions on opposite sides of the camera lens affixed to pivoting axes, and two shutter arms affixed to the two shutter portions which rotate about the pivoting axes to move the two shutter portions together to be contiguous with one another in front of the camera lens.