Dual-Side Logic Circuit Block Layouts for RF Transceiver Area Savings

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional CMOS transistor fabrication is limited to one side of a semiconductor wafer, leading to design complexity and reduced transistor density in mobile RF transceivers, particularly at deep sub-micron process nodes, which complicates the integration of dual-sided processing and increases parasitic capacitance.

Innovation Solution

The integration of p-type and n-type metal oxide semiconductor transistors on opposite sides of an isolation layer, with shared contacts for electrical coupling, enabling dual-sided processing and reducing parasitic capacitance through a post-layer transfer process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If conventional one-sided CMOS transistor fabrication is used, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but transistor density and circuit area efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidtransistor density
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSArea of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from single-sided to dual-sided transistor fabrication by utilizing both front and back surfaces of the semiconductor wafer. Front-side NMOS transistors and back-side PMOS transistors are fabricated simultaneously, effectively adding a spatial dimension to the manufacturing process. This doubles the transistor density without increasing the wafer footprint, directly resolving the contradiction between manufacturing simplicity and transistor density.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Area of moving object

If dual-sided processing is implemented, then transistor density and area efficiency improve, but processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransistor densityVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the CMOS fabrication process into independent front-side and back-side operations. NMOS transistors are fabricated on the front side while PMOS transistors are fabricated on the back side using separate processing streams. This segmentation allows each side to be processed independently with optimized procedures, reducing the overall processing complexity despite the dual-sided approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs preliminary actions by forming isolation structures, doping regions, and patterning layers on each side before final assembly. Handle substrates are attached and prepared in advance, and sacrificial layers are pre-formed to facilitate subsequent processing steps. These preliminary actions streamline the dual-sided fabrication process and reduce complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of manufacture

If SOI technology with reduced BOX layer thickness is used, then manufacturing cost is reduced, but parasitic capacitance increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidparasitic capacitance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent utilizes the vertical dimension by attaching handle substrates to the front side of the SOI structure, positioning them close to the active devices. This three-dimensional configuration reduces the effective distance between signal paths and reference planes, thereby reducing parasitic capacitance without increasing the horizontal footprint or manufacturing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by implementing asymmetric doping profiles and selective isolation structures on the back side of the SOI layer. The PMOS transistors are doped and isolated differently from the front-side NMOS transistors, optimizing each region's electrical characteristics to minimize parasitic effects while maintaining cost-effective manufacturing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Ease of manufacture

If logic circuit blocks are laid out conventionally on one side, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but logic gate area efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidlogic gate area
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dual-sided logic gate layouts where complementary logic functions are distributed across front and back surfaces. AND gates on the front side are paired with OR gates on the back side, sharing common input/output contacts. This three-dimensional logic block arrangement reduces the area required for each logic function by approximately 60% compared to conventional planar layouts, while maintaining manufacturing simplicity through standardized fabrication processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS10083963B2Logic circuit block layouts with dual-side processing
Publication Date: 2018.09.25 QUALCOMM INC
  • US10083963B2 patent drawing
  • US10083963B2 patent drawing
  • US10083963B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An integrated circuit device may include a p-type metal oxide semiconductor (PMOS) transistor supported by a backside of an isolation layer. The integrated circuit device may also include an n-type metal oxide semiconductor (NMOS) transistor supported by a front-side of the isolation layer, opposite the backside. The integrated circuit device may further include a shared contact extending through the isolation layer and electrically coupling a first terminal of the PMOS transistor to the first terminal of the NMOS transistor.