Dual Silicide FinFET Contact Formation via Crystal Orientation Selectivity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The formation of advanced FinFETs requires precise optimization of contact parameters, particularly in minimizing the presence of second metal silicide in NFET S/D regions and first metal silicide in PFET S/D regions, which poses challenges in achieving high-performance semiconductor devices.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the formation of PFET and NFET fins with specific epitaxial silicon and silicon-germanium layers, followed by deposition of metal silicides and fill metals, ensuring precise control through various processing steps like trench formation, metal deposition, and annealing to achieve the desired silicide formation without cross-contamination.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If different metal silicides are used for NFET and PFET contacts to optimize transistor performance, then device performance is improved, but cross-contamination between silicide types increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransistor performanceVSAvoidsilicide cross-contamination
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by making the fin structures asymmetric - NFET fins have a first crystal orientation while PFET fins have a second crystal orientation. This local differentiation allows selective silicide formation where each fin type responds differently to the same deposition conditions, enabling contact optimization for each transistor type while preventing cross-contamination through the crystallographic selectivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the crystal orientation parameter of the fin structures - NFET fins are oriented with <100> direction while PFET fins are oriented with <110> direction. This parameter change creates fundamental differences in silicide formation behavior between the two fin types, allowing selective metal silicide deposition and preventing cross-contamination while maintaining optimal electrical performance for each transistor type

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If fin pitch is reduced to increase device density, then packing efficiency is improved, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice densityVSAvoidcontact formation precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating distinct crystal orientations in adjacent fin structures - NFET fins with <100> orientation and PFET fins with <110> orientation. This local differentiation provides inherent selectivity that simplifies contact formation processes, allowing precise metal silicide deposition on specific fin types even at reduced pitch, thereby maintaining manufacturing precision while enabling higher device density

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of attempting to form different silicides on identical fin structures through complex masking and selective deposition, the patent inverts the approach by making the fins themselves different through crystal orientation. This inversion simplifies the contact formation process, as the crystallographic difference naturally provides the selectivity needed for precise silicide formation without requiring complex process steps

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables the creation of high-performance FinFETs with accurate silicide formation, enhancing the efficiency and density of semiconductor device packing while maintaining optimal performance and reducing production costs.

Implementation Method 1

annealing the semiconductor device, thereby silicidating the first metal and silicidating the second metal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSilicidation: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 2

forming a first epitaxial silicon-germanium layer over the epitaxial silicon layer on the PFET fin; forming a second epitaxial silicon-germanium layer over the NFET fin

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEpitaxy: Epitaxy

Data Source

PatentUS10236218B1Methods, apparatus and system for forming wrap-around contact with dual silicide
Publication Date: 2019.03.19 GLOBALFOUNDRIES US INC
  • US10236218B1 patent drawing
  • US10236218B1 patent drawing
  • US10236218B1 patent drawing

AI summary

At least one method, apparatus and system disclosed herein involves forming semiconductor devices comprising dual silicides in contacts to FinFETs. The semiconductor device may comprise a PFET fin; an NFET fin; a first metal silicide around the NFET fin; a second metal silicide around the PFET fin; and a fill metal around the second metal silicide, above the PFET fin, and above the NFET fin. Methods of forming such devices are also disclosed.