Dual-Stage Landing Gear Strut for Abnormal Impact Absorption

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional oleo-pneumatic shock-absorbing struts in aircraft landing gear are insufficient in managing abnormal landing forces, leading to potential damage due to excessive force transfer during abnormal landing conditions.

Innovation Solution

A dual-stage shock strut design incorporating an oleo-pneumatic first stage and a spring-based second stage, where the first stage absorbs normal impact forces independently and the second stage engages to absorb excessive forces, providing adjustable energy absorption and damping capabilities through varying configurations of springs and damping mechanisms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a conventional single-stage oleo-pneumatic strut is used, then the device complexity is low, but the ability to manage abnormal landing forces is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to manage abnormal landing forcesVSAvoidstrut configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The shock-absorbing strut is divided into two independent stages: a first stage with an oleo-pneumatic system for normal landing forces, and a second stage with a spring-based system for excessive forces. This segmentation allows each stage to be optimized for its specific function, improving overall reliability without requiring complete redesign of the entire system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The strut system transitions from a static single-stage design to a dynamic two-stage design where the second stage is selectively engaged based on the magnitude of applied forces. The system adapts its characteristics automatically: the oleo-pneumatic stage handles routine operations while the spring stage activates during abnormal conditions, providing dynamic responsiveness to varying load conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Strength

If a dual-stage design with spring-based second stage is implemented, then the energy absorption capability for excessive forces is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy absorption capabilityVSAvoidstrut configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The second spring-based stage is pre-configured and positioned to engage only when forces exceed the first stage's absorption capacity. This beforehand preparation ensures that excessive forces are immediately cushioned by the second stage without requiring complex real-time control systems, thereby improving energy absorption capability while limiting the increase in device complexity to mechanical positioning mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Adaptability or versatility

If the second stage is designed to engage only under excessive forces, then the adaptability to different landing conditions is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse to different landing conditionsVSAvoidengagement mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The two-stage system operates autonomously based on the physical conditions of each landing event. The transition between stages is self-regulated by the force magnitude itself, with no external control or monitoring required. This self-service operation achieves high adaptability to different landing conditions while minimizing the complexity of engagement mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The dual-stage design effectively absorbs and dampens a wide range of landing forces, preventing aircraft damage by distributing and dissipating energy efficiently during both normal and abnormal landing conditions, while maintaining a compact and lightweight configuration suitable for retractable landing gear.

Implementation Method 1

converts kinetic energy into potential energy by the use of a pressurized gas, thereby providing elastic spring characteristics

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOleo-pneumatic energy conversion: Compression

Implementation Method 2

Damping of this energy conversion and reduction of 'bounce' is accomplished via oil or the like, typically being forced through a damping orifice

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectViscous damping: Viscous Damping

Implementation Method 3

a spring-based second stage, where the first stage absorbs normal impact forces independently and the second stage engages to absorb excessive forces

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring elasticity: Spring

Data Source

PatentEP4003835B1Shock absorbing strut
Publication Date: 2023.10.18 SAFRAN LANDING SYST CANADA INC
  • EP4003835B1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP4003835B1 patent drawingFigure 1B
  • EP4003835B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

A shock strut is provided that includes a first energy absorption stage or load limiter and a second energy absorption stage or load limiter. The second energy absorption stage or load limiter includes one or more disc springs (205). The shock strut can be employed on both fixed and retractable landing gear alike, while providing design adjustability for obtaining load-deflection curves that accommodate a range of descent or impact velocities.