Dual Substrate MEMS Plate Switch for Compact Durability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) switch devices, particularly those with cantilevered designs, face challenges in durability and compactness due to the need for a thin, delicate upper substrate that is susceptible to damage and limited in spacing and flexibility, which affects the stiffness and placement of switch contacts.

Innovation Solution

The development of an electrostatic MEMS plate switch using dual substrates, where a deformable plate with shunt bars is formed on one substrate and electrical contacts on another, allowing for a hermetic seal and flexible spring beams to support the plate, enabling stronger restoring forces and compact design without impacting plate dimensions, and allowing multiple switches on a single plate.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a thin upper substrate is used to enable electrostatic deflection, then the switch can be activated, but the substrate becomes delicate and susceptible to damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveswitch activationVSAvoidsubstrate durability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The device is divided into two separate substrates: a first substrate that provides mechanical support and a second substrate that is thin and movable. This segmentation allows the thin substrate to be flexible enough for actuation while the thicker first substrate provides durability and protection against damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of operation

If the upper substrate is made thin for moveability, then electrostatic deflection is enabled, but the spacing and placement of switch contacts is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrostatic deflectionVSAvoidcontact spacing options
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

By separating the device into two substrates, the design decouples the mechanical support function from the movable contact function. This allows the second substrate to be thin for deflection while the first substrate can accommodate various contact spacings and configurations without compromising structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Ease of operation

If a cantilevered beam design is used, then the switch can function, but the device size is increased and compactness is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveswitch functionVSAvoiddevice compactness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention transitions from a traditional cantilevered beam design to a parallel plate configuration where the movable contact is a plate parallel to the fixed substrate. This dimensional change allows for a more compact arrangement, reducing the overall device volume while maintaining switching functionality through electrostatic attraction between the parallel plates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Speed

If the restoring force stiffness is increased, then the switch response is improved, but the plate dimensions must be reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveswitch response speedVSAvoidplate dimensions
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSArea of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent allows for adjustment of the restoring force stiffness by modifying parameters such as the spring constant of the support structure or the electrostatic field strength, independent of plate dimensions. This enables optimization of switch response speed without necessarily reducing plate size, as the stiffness can be tuned through material properties or geometric parameters of the support structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design enhances the durability and compactness of the MEMS switch, providing adjustable stiffness, increased spacing options for contacts, and improved resistance to vibrations and contamination, while maintaining high switching speed and reliability across a wide frequency range.

Implementation Method 1

an electrostatic electrode disposed adjacent to the deformable plate and on the second substrate. Upon applying a voltage between the deformable plate and the electrostatic electrode, the electrostatic force deforms the deformable plate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrostatic force: Electrostatics

Data Source

PatentUS7893798B2Dual substrate MEMS plate switch and method of manufacture
Publication Date: 2011.02.22 CENFIRE CORP
  • US7893798B2 patent drawing
  • US7893798B2 patent drawing
  • US7893798B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for forming an electrostatic MEMS plate switch include forming a deformable plate on a first substrate, forming the electrical contacts on a second substrate, and coupling the two substrates using a hermetic seal. The deformable plate may have at least one shunt bar located at a nodal line of a vibrational mode of the deformable plate, so that the shunt bar remains relatively stationary when the plate is vibrating in that vibrational mode. The hermetic seal may be a gold/indium alloy, formed by heating a layer of indium plated over a layer of gold. Electrical access to the electrostatic MEMS switch may be made by forming vias through the thickness of the second substrate.