Dual-Surface Ejector for Quiet Adaptive Product Sorting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing ejector devices are noisy, inefficient, and require multiple configurations for different products, leading to increased equipment and design complexity, especially when handling diverse product streams with varying requirements.

Innovation Solution

An ejector device with a movable guide surface and stop surface that can deflect products laterally, allowing for dual functionality by either actively pushing or passively guiding products out of the conveying path, adaptable to different products through interchangeable guide profiles and controlled movements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If blow nozzles are used for ejecting products, then sorting speed is improved, but noise level increases and compressed air consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesorting speedVSAvoidnoise level
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the pneumatic blow nozzle system with a mechanical pusher system. The pusher uses a mechanically actuated ejector element that physically contacts and pushes products off the conveyor belt, eliminating the need for compressed air and thereby reducing noise while maintaining sorting capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the high-consumption blow nozzle pneumatic system with a more efficient pneumatic actuator that controls the mechanical pusher. This reduces compressed air consumption by only actuating the pusher when needed rather than continuously blowing air, while still achieving rapid product ejection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple ejectors are used for different products, then product sorting capability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct sorting capabilityVSAvoidequipment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal ejector design with interchangeable profile elements that can be configured for different product types. Instead of having separate ejectors for each product, a single multi-functional ejector can handle various products by changing the profile element, thereby reducing the number of devices needed while maintaining versatility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a dynamically adjustable ejector system where the profile element can be changed or reconfigured based on the product being sorted. This dynamic adaptability allows one ejector to perform multiple functions that previously required multiple fixed ejectors, reducing overall system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If pushers are used for belt clearing, then all products can be removed from conveyor, but product spacing requirements increase and sorting reliability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebelt clearing capabilityVSAvoidsorting reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent positions the pusher to engage products before they reach the end of the conveyor belt, allowing for controlled ejection of multiple products in sequence. This preliminary positioning enables reliable belt clearing without requiring excessive product spacing, as the pusher can systematically remove products one after another

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables efficient, quiet, and adaptable sorting of diverse products without intermediate conversions, reducing equipment complexity and ensuring products are sorted without damage, while minimizing inertial forces and optimizing sorting speed and direction.

Implementation Method 1

minimizing inertial forces

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInertial forces: Inertia

Data Source

PatentEP4714871A1Ejector device
Publication Date: 2026.03.25 WIPOTEC GMBH
  • EP4714871A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4714871A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4714871A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to an ejector device for the targeted sorting of products from a conveying stream, in which a movable ejector in a dual function comprises a stop surface and a guide surface with a defined guide profile, so that the ejector is suitable both for actively ejecting individual products by means of a lateral push movement and for sorting by means of the conveying movement of the products.