Dual TDC Detector Array with Autocalibration for TOF-PET

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional radiation detectors for time-of-flight positron emission tomography (TOF-PET) face challenges in achieving sub-nanosecond temporal resolution due to coarse system clocks and spatial variations, leading to errors in temporal resolution and localization of positron emission events.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a dual time-to-digital converter (TDC) system with automatic self-calibration and tunable delay elements in the trigger circuitry to correct for temporal drift and spatial skew, enhancing the precision of time stamping and spatial localization of radiation events.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a coarse system clock (e.g., 200 MHz) is used for time stamping, then the device complexity is reduced, but the temporal resolution is insufficient for sub-nanosecond TOF PET imaging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem clock complexityVSAvoidtemporal resolution
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The time measurement function is segmented into two independent TDC channels, each with its own fine counter and clock reference. This segmentation allows each channel to operate independently with optimized timing parameters, achieving sub-nanosecond resolution without requiring an overly complex single-clock system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A delay element is introduced as an intermediary component between the trigger signal and the TDC input. This delay element provides precise temporal offset adjustment, enabling accurate time stamping relative to the system clock while maintaining sub-nanosecond resolution

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Device complexity

If trigger circuitry triggers on the first detected photon or a fixed photon count, then the device complexity is reduced, but spatial skew across the detector array causes substantial temporal errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrigger circuitry complexityVSAvoidtemporal accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The trigger criterion is changed from a fixed photon count to a dynamic criterion based on accumulated photon count compared against a threshold. This parameter change allows adaptation to spatial variations in detector response, compensating for skew across the detector array while maintaining relatively simple trigger circuitry

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If voltage and temperature variations are not compensated, then the device complexity is reduced, but temporal drift in the fine counter output degrades effective temporal resolution

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompensation circuitry complexityVSAvoidtemporal resolution stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

A feedback mechanism is implemented where the accumulated photon count is continuously monitored and used to adjust the trigger threshold. This feedback loop compensates for temporal drift caused by voltage and temperature variations, maintaining stable temporal resolution without requiring complex external compensation circuitry

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach improves the temporal and spatial resolution of radiation detection events, providing more accurate time-of-flight PET imaging by compensating for system clock limitations and spatial variations, thereby enhancing the overall performance of the PET detector array.

Implementation Method 1

a single 511 keV gamma ray produces a scintillation comprising many photons in the optical or other wavelength range

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectScintillation: Scintillation

Implementation Method 2

silicon-based single-photon avalanche diode (SPAD) detectors... detect the 511 keV gamma rays in conjunction with a scintillator

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotoelectric effect: Photoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentEP2695000B1Detector array with time-to-digital conversion having improved temporal accuracy
Publication Date: 2018.05.30 KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NV
  • EP2695000B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2695000B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2695000B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A detector (22) detects an event. First and second time-to-digital converters(TDCs) (70, 72) generate first and second time stamps (TS1, TS2) for the detection of the event. The first TDC and the second TDC are both synchronized with a common clock signal (62) that defines a fixed time offset between the second TDC and the first TDC. An autocalibration circuit (120) adjusts the first TDC and the second TDC to keep the time difference between the second time stamp and the first time stamp equal to the fixed time offset between the second TDC and the first TDC. The detector may be a detector array, and trigger circuitry (28) propagates a trigger signal from a triggering detector of the array of detectors to the first and second TDC's. Skew correction circuitry (132, 134, 136, 142, 60, 162) adjusts a timestamp (TS) based on which detector is the triggering detector.