Dual-Threshold Carrier Sense for Interference Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In near-field wireless communication, it is challenging to determine whether errors in transmission/reception processing are due to interference or other factors, especially when using high sensitivity carrier sense thresholds, which can lead to incorrect interference detection and inefficient error handling.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a two-level carrier sense mechanism with different thresholds to differentiate between idle and busy states, allowing for accurate determination of interference by comparing busy determination times using both the first and second carrier sense thresholds.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a high sensitivity carrier sense threshold is used to enable near-field communication, then connection facilitation is improved, but interference detection accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnection facilitationVSAvoidinterference detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the carrier sense mechanism into two distinct levels: a first carrier sense threshold for connection facilitation and a second carrier sense threshold for interference detection. This segmentation allows each threshold to serve its specific function independently, resolving the contradiction between connection ease and detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different sensitivity levels (qualities) to different detection purposes: high sensitivity for connection establishment and low sensitivity for interference detection. This local quality differentiation enables the system to optimize for each specific function without compromise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Device complexity

If a single carrier sense threshold is used, then device complexity is reduced, but the ability to differentiate error causes deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecarrier sense mechanism complexityVSAvoiderror cause differentiation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the error detection capability into two segments: one for detecting connection-related issues and another for detecting interference-related issues. This segmentation enables accurate error cause differentiation while maintaining manageable system complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary carrier sense checks using both thresholds before transmission to establish a baseline state. This preliminary action enables the system to compare pre- and post-transmission states and accurately determine error causes without requiring complex real-time analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If carrier sense is performed continuously to improve interference detection, then power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterference detection capabilityVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements periodic carrier sense checks at specific intervals (before transmission, during transmission, and after transmission) rather than continuous monitoring. This periodic action maintains adequate interference detection capability while significantly reducing power consumption compared to continuous monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS10085285B2Wireless communication apparatus and interference detection method
Publication Date: 2018.09.25 INT SEMICON GRP
  • US10085285B2 patent drawing
  • US10085285B2 patent drawing
  • US10085285B2 patent drawing

AI summary

According to one embodiment, a wireless communication apparatus is provided with first and second determination units. The first unit determines based on a first carrier sense threshold whether busy state or not and specifies a first time when busy state is determined with the first threshold, and determines based on a second carrier sense threshold smaller than the first threshold whether busy state or not and specifies a second time when busy state is determined. The second unit determines, if at least busy state is determined based on the second threshold and the second time precedes a reference time equal to or earlier than the first time, to perform processing for avoiding interference.