Dual Threshold Check Valve for Bidirectional Flow Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional check valves only operate effectively at a single threshold volumetric flow rate, failing to manage fluid flow efficiently across different flow rates in both directions, which is undesirable for applications requiring dual threshold control.

Innovation Solution

A dual threshold check valve design featuring a first sealing element to restrict flow in one direction when the upstream flow rate is below a first threshold and a second sealing element, biased to allow unrestricted flow in the opposite direction when the upstream flow rate is below a second threshold, utilizing a spring and a stainless steel ball to achieve robust sealing and flow control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a traditional single-threshold check valve is used, then the valve structure is simple, but it cannot manage fluid flow efficiently across different flow rates in both directions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow rate control capabilityVSAvoidvalve structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The valve is segmented into two independent sealing elements (first sealing element and second sealing element), each responsible for controlling flow in one direction with its own threshold. This segmentation allows the valve to handle different flow rates in both directions independently, improving adaptability while keeping each sealing element's structure relatively simple

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The valve body and passage are designed to accommodate multiple sealing elements with different functions - the first sealing element restricts forward flow below a first threshold, while the second sealing element restricts reverse flow below a second threshold. This multi-functionality allows a single valve to perform dual threshold control without requiring separate valves for each direction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If a first sealing element is added to restrict flow in one direction, then flow control in the first direction is improved, but the valve structure becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebidirectional flow controlVSAvoidsealing element quantity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple sealing elements are merged within a single valve body and passage, allowing them to operate cooperatively. The first and second sealing elements share the same valve housing and fluid passage, reducing the need for separate valve assemblies and minimizing overall structural complexity while achieving bidirectional flow control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Productivity

If dual threshold control is implemented, then flow management efficiency is improved, but the manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow management efficiencyVSAvoidvalve manufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

Each sealing element is designed with specific local properties optimized for its direction of operation. The first sealing element has characteristics suited for forward flow restriction, while the second sealing element has characteristics optimized for reverse flow restriction. This local quality optimization allows efficient flow management in each direction while using standardized manufacturing processes for each component type

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables efficient fluid flow management by allowing baseline unrestricted flow in one direction while restricting flow to a predetermined rate in the other direction, maintaining robust sealing and eliminating the need for additional spring biasing, thus addressing the limitations of single-threshold valves.

Implementation Method 1

A second sealing element is biased to unrestrict flow of the fluid to a baseline unrestricted flow rate in a second direction through the passage when an upstream volumetric flow rate of the fluid in the second direction is less than a second predetermined threshold

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Data Source

PatentUS8196597B2Check valve
Publication Date: 2012.06.12 BENDIX COMMERCIAL VEHICLE SYSTEMS LLC
  • US8196597B2 patent drawing
  • US8196597B2 patent drawing
  • US8196597B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In one aspect of the present invention, it is contemplated that a valve includes a passage. A first sealing element is biased to restrict flow of a fluid in a first direction through the passage when an upstream volumetric flow rate of the fluid in the first direction is less than a first predetermined threshold. A second sealing element is biased to unrestrict flow of the fluid to a baseline unrestricted flow rate in a second direction through the passage when an upstream volumetric flow rate of the fluid in the second direction is less than a second predetermined threshold.