Dual-Threshold Medical Image Classification Reducing False Positives

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Medical image detection systems face a trade-off between sensitivity and specificity, often resulting in false positives and negatives, which can lead to missed life-threatening conditions or unnecessary medical procedures, due to the sensitivity/specificity trade-off depicted in the ROC curve.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a dual-threshold system where a more stringent first threshold is set based on the highest score of known true positives, and a second threshold is adjusted to detect significant true positives, allowing for the avoidance of processing false positives by only considering inputs with scores above the first threshold, or using a statistical approach to identify inputs significantly higher than the mean score.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a single threshold is used to classify detection inputs, then the system is simple to operate, but it results in false positives and false negatives due to the sensitivity/specificity trade-off

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethreshold setting simplicityVSAvoiddetection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The single threshold is segmented into two distinct thresholds: a first threshold for initial screening and a second threshold for final confirmation. This segmentation allows the system to differentiate between potential positives and confirmed positives, reducing false positives while maintaining ease of operation through automated multi-stage classification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The classification system transitions from a single-dimensional threshold to a two-dimensional threshold structure. By adding another dimension of classification (first threshold level and second threshold level), the system can simultaneously improve sensitivity and specificity without complicating the operational workflow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If the threshold is set to detect more true positives, then sensitivity increases, but the fraction of false positives increases, decreasing specificity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrue positive detection rateVSAvoidfalse positives
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The first threshold performs a preliminary screening action to identify potential positives, followed by a second threshold confirmation action. This preliminary action allows the system to cast a wider net for true positives while the second threshold filters out false positives, achieving both high sensitivity and high specificity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The first threshold acts as an intermediary between the raw detection scores and the final classification. It serves as a intermediate filtering stage that captures potential positives while the second threshold provides the final verification, thereby reducing false positives while maintaining true positive detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Object-generated harmful factors

If the threshold is made more stringent to reduce false positives, then specificity improves, but the number of true positives detected decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefalse positivesVSAvoidtrue positive detection rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The first threshold applies a partial screening action that is less stringent than the final confirmation threshold, capturing both true positives and false positives. The second threshold then applies the excessive action of strict verification to filter out false positives while maintaining the true positives detected in the first stage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The verification process is segmented into two stages: initial identification at the first threshold and final confirmation at the second threshold. This segmentation allows the system to maintain high sensitivity in the first stage while achieving high specificity in the second stage, overall improving both metrics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Reliability

If all inputs above a threshold are processed, then true positives are detected, but false positives require unnecessary medical procedures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection completenessVSAvoidprocessing time for false positives
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and separates false positives from true positives through the two-stage threshold process. Inputs that fail to meet the second threshold are extracted as false positives and excluded from further processing, while only inputs meeting both thresholds proceed to medical procedure evaluation, eliminating unnecessary time consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The second threshold performs a preliminary verification action before initiating medical procedures. This preliminary action filters out false positives early in the process, ensuring that only confirmed true positives undergo further investigation and treatment, thereby reducing wasted time and resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS7623694B2Method and apparatus for classifying detection inputs in medical images
Publication Date: 2009.11.24 MEVIS MEDICAL SOLUTIONS AG
  • US7623694B2 patent drawing
  • US7623694B2 patent drawing
  • US7623694B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Detection inputs are classified using two thresholds. In a preferred embodiment, a multiplicity of inputs are scored and the scored inputs are searched to locate an input that has a score greater than a first threshold. If such input is found, every input having a score in excess of a second threshold lower than the first threshold is identified as belonging to a first class of interest. If no input is found having a score in excess of the first threshold, no inputs are identified as belonging to the first class.