Dual Tip Cutter Chip Load Sharing for Hard Turning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In hard-turning processes, especially for large work pieces like windmill bearing rings, existing cutting tools face challenges with heat generation, coolant evaporation, and reduced service life due to increased cutting depth, leading to premature wear and decreased productivity.

Innovation Solution

A dual tip cutter design with a body defining feed, cutting, and depth directions, featuring a first and second cutting portion stacked in the cutting direction, where the relative positioning between the portions shares the total cutting load in a predetermined ratio to distribute chip load effectively, allowing for simultaneous cutting and extended tool life.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If cutting depth is increased to improve material removal rate, then productivity increases, but cutter service life significantly reduces due to heavier load and increased chip load

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial removal rateVSAvoidcutter service life
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The cutting tool is divided into multiple cutting portions (first and second cutting portions) stacked in the cutting direction. Each cutting portion shares the total cutting load, allowing deeper cutting depth while maintaining acceptable load per cutting edge, thus extending service life while improving material removal rate

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If turning speed is increased to improve material removal rate, then productivity increases, but heat generation at the cutting edge significantly increases, limiting the speed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial removal rateVSAvoidheat generation at cutting edge
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple cutting portions share the cutting load and heat generation. By distributing the total cutting load across multiple cutting edges, the heat generation per cutting edge is reduced, allowing higher turning speeds without excessive temperature rise

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Productivity

If feed rate is increased to improve material removal rate, then productivity increases, but surface finish quality deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial removal rateVSAvoidsurface finish quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The first and second cutting portions can be positioned to perform different functions - one for rough cutting and one for finishing, allowing higher feed rates while maintaining surface quality through the combined action of multiple cutting edges

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Duration of action of moving object

If high pressure coolant systems are used to extend cutter service life, then coolant reaches the cutting edge effectively, but the system complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutter service lifeVSAvoidcoolant system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

By dividing the cutting load across multiple cutting portions, the heat generation per cutting edge is reduced, which decreases coolant evaporation and allows effective coolant delivery at lower pressures, simplifying the coolant system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS9592558B2Dual tip cutter and method of hard turning
Publication Date: 2017.03.14 THE TIMKEN CO(US)
  • US9592558B2 patent drawing
  • US9592558B2 patent drawing
  • US9592558B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A dual tip cutter (10) includes a body (12) defining a feed direction (F), a cutting direction (C) perpendicular to the feed direction, and a depth direction (D) perpendicular to both feed and cutting directions. A first cutting portion (35) is fixed relative to the body at a body first end. A second cutting portion (45) is fixed relative to the body at the body first end, adjacent the first cutting portion. The first and second cutting portions are stacked in the cutting direction so that the first cutting portion forms a leading cutting portion and the second cutting portion forms a trailing cutting portion for simultaneous cutting. The second cutting portion extends from the body further in the depth direction than the first cutting portion. A relative position between the first and second cutting portions is set such that a total chip load is shared between the first and second cutting portions in a predetermined ratio (K).