Dual-Toroidal EMI Choke for Common and Differential Mode Damping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing passive electrotechnical components struggle to effectively dampen both common mode and differential mode interference on electrical lines, which degrade the quality and usability of wanted or useful signals.

Innovation Solution

A passive electrotechnical component with two toroidal cores, one made of ferrite for common mode interference damping and the other of iron powder for differential mode interference damping, arranged in a compact and cost-effective manner, using a holding and separating element to ensure winding separation and stability under vibrations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single toroidal core is used for both common mode and differential mode damping, then device complexity is reduced, but the damping effectiveness for both interference types cannot be simultaneously optimized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of toroidal coresVSAvoiddamping effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the filtering function into two separate toroidal cores: the first toroidal core is dedicated to common mode interference damping, while the second toroidal core handles differential mode interference damping. This segmentation allows each core to be optimized for its specific function without compromising the other, resolving the contradiction between device simplicity and damping effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If the second toroidal core material is selected for high saturation, then differential mode interference damping is improved, but the core may saturate during normal operation causing signal distortion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedifferential mode dampingVSAvoidcore saturation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent carefully selects and adjusts parameters of the second toroidal core, including its material composition (ferrite or iron powder), geometric dimensions, and winding configuration, to achieve high saturation resistance. These parameter optimizations ensure the core maintains its magnetic properties during normal operation while still effectively damping differential mode interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the inductance of the differential mode choke is increased, then differential mode interference damping is improved, but the wanted or useful signal is excessively damped

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedifferential mode dampingVSAvoidsignal attenuation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different quality characteristics to different parts of the system: the first toroidal core is optimized for common mode damping with appropriate inductance, while the second toroidal core is specifically designed with controlled inductance to damp differential mode interference without excessively attenuating the useful signal. This local optimization resolves the contradiction between interference damping and signal preservation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Reliability

If two separate chokes are used for common mode and differential mode damping, then damping effectiveness is improved, but manufacturing cost and assembly complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterference dampingVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines two separate choke functions into a single integrated component structure where two toroidal cores are mounted together with shared windings and common mounting hardware. This merging approach maintains the damping effectiveness of separate chokes while reducing manufacturing cost and assembly complexity compared to using completely independent choke assemblies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Simultaneously damps common mode and differential mode interference while maintaining the integrity of useful signals, suitable for network applications with high voltages, and ensures reliable operation under mechanical stress.

Implementation Method 1

The windings on the first toroidal core of the common mode choke are wound and/or interconnected in such a manner that the magnetic fluxes caused by the common mode interference on the different lines and therefore on the different windings accumulate in the toroidal core such that the common mode interference is thereby damped

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic flux accumulation: Magnetic Field

Implementation Method 2

The magnetic fluxes generated on the first toroidal core by the wanted or useful signal, on the other hand, cancel one another out, and therefore virtually no damping of the wanted or useful signal is caused

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic flux cancellation: Magnetic Field

Implementation Method 3

In the second toroidal core of the differential mode choke, the differential mode interference on the different lines and therefore on the different windings generates magnetic fluxes which mutually accumulate. As a result, differential mode interference is damped on the second toroidal core of the differential mode choke

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic flux accumulation: Magnetic Field

Implementation Method 4

the first toroidal core is formed from ferrite, in particular from manganese-zinc ferrite

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFerrite magnetic damping: Ferromagnetism

Implementation Method 5

the second toroidal core is formed from iron, in particular from iron powder

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIron powder saturation resistance: Ferromagnetic Powder

Data Source

PatentUS20260038725A1Passive Electrotechnical Component
Publication Date: 2026.02.05 WURTH ELEKTRONIK EISOS
  • US20260038725A1 patent drawing
  • US20260038725A1 patent drawing
  • US20260038725A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a passive electrotechnical component for damping common mode and differential mode interference on at least two electrical lines leading to the component, with two toroidal cores, wherein at least two windings are arranged on each toroidal core, wherein the two windings on the first annular core are wound and/or interconnected in such a manner that high damping of common mode signals on the electrical lines is obtained, and wherein the windings on the second toroidal core are wound and/or interconnected in such a manner that high damping of differential mode interference on the electrical lines is obtained.