Dual Trigger Weapon Control for Assisted Long-Range Firing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing weapon systems face challenges in accurately hitting targets at long ranges due to environmental and ballistic factors, such as gravity, drag, wind, and target motion, especially when mounted on moving platforms, where human reaction times are insufficient to compensate for these factors.

Innovation Solution

A dual trigger weapon control system with integrated manual and assisted targeting, featuring a mechanical trigger for immediate firing and an electronic trigger that activates firing control logic to compensate for environmental and ballistic factors, ensuring the weapon fires only when aiming conditions are met.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual aiming and firing is used, then the system remains simple and reliable, but accuracy at long ranges deteriorates due to insufficient human reaction time to compensate for environmental and ballistic factors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaiming accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an automated firing system as an intermediary between the operator and the weapon. The system includes sensors that detect environmental conditions (wind, temperature, pressure), a ballistic computer that calculates trajectory corrections, and an automated trigger mechanism that executes the firing command. This intermediary system compensates for human reaction time limitations while maintaining overall system reliability through the preservation of manual override capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical aiming and firing with an automated electronic system. Sensors electronically detect environmental parameters, a computer electronically processes ballistic calculations, and an electronic trigger mechanism replaces the purely mechanical pull-trigger. This substitution enables real-time compensation for environmental factors that would be impossible to calculate manually.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If automated firing control logic is added, then firing accuracy improves by compensating for environmental factors, but device complexity increases due to additional sensors and control systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefiring accuracyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the firing control system into distinct functional modules: environmental sensors (wind, temperature, pressure sensors), targeting sensors (laser range finder, electro-optical sensors), a ballistic computer for calculations, and a trigger actuator mechanism. Each module performs a specific function and can be independently tested, maintained, and replaced, reducing overall system complexity despite the addition of multiple components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent designs the control system to perform multiple functions: the sensor array detects both environmental conditions and target parameters, the ballistic computer calculates both trajectory and timing, and the trigger actuator can execute both automated and manual firing commands. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate dedicated components for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If the electronic trigger is made interdependent with the manual trigger, then coordinated firing control is achieved, but reliability deteriorates due to potential inhibition of manual firing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoordinated controlVSAvoidfiring reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic trigger system where the electronic and manual triggers operate independently by default but can coordinate when needed. The system allows the operator to switch between purely manual mode, purely automated mode, and coordinated mode depending on situational requirements. This dynamic flexibility ensures that the electronic system enhances rather than restricts manual firing reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of making the manual trigger dependent on the electronic system (which would reduce reliability), the patent inverts the relationship by making the electronic trigger capable of independent operation while preserving full manual trigger functionality. The electronic system provides assistance rather than control, ensuring that manual reliability is maintained while enabling automated coordination when desired.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Data Source

PatentUS12566047B2Dual trigger weapon control system with integrated manual and assisted targeting
Publication Date: 2026.03.03 FLEX FORCE ENTERPRISES
  • US12566047B2 patent drawing
  • US12566047B2 patent drawing
  • US12566047B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The devices, systems, and methods described herein are directed to a manual and assisted targeting system integrated into a weapon control system that includes dual triggers. One trigger is fully manual and is always operational. The second trigger is electronically controlled and is linked to aiming sensors, targeting sensors, and a controller comprising firing control logic. The firing control logic calculates an aim goal, based at least partially on location information pertaining to the target, and determines when the difference between the aimpoint of the weapon and the aim goal is below a threshold. In response to this determination, a control signal is sent to a trigger actuator to fire the weapon.