Dual-Workpiece Machine Tool Layout for Higher Output in Less Space

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing machine tools for machining workpieces are inefficient in terms of output rate, footprint, component count, and material usage, particularly when machining multiple workpieces simultaneously.

Innovation Solution

A machine tool design that allows for simultaneous or sequential machining of two workpieces using a single tool, with features including rotating workpiece mounts, independent drive control, and a single tool dresser, reducing the need for multiple machine tools and optimizing tool usage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If two separate machine tools are used to machine two workpieces simultaneously, then the output rate is maintained, but the footprint, component count, and material usage are doubled

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoutput rateVSAvoidfootprint
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines two separate machine tools into a single integrated machine tool that can machine two workpieces simultaneously. The first and second workpiece mounts are integrated on a single machine base, sharing common structural components, control systems, and tooling resources, thereby achieving dual workpiece processing without doubling the footprint

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The single machine tool is designed with multi-functional capability to process two different workpieces using a single tool. The tool mount can service both the first workpiece on the first workpiece mount and the second workpiece on the second workpiece mount, making the machine tool universal and eliminating the need for separate dedicated machines

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Productivity

If two separate machine tools are used to machine two workpieces simultaneously, then the output rate is maintained, but the component count and material usage are doubled

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoutput rateVSAvoidcomponent count
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple components into a shared infrastructure. The machine base, control system, tool mounting mechanism, and support structures are shared between the two workpiece processing stations, significantly reducing the total component count compared to two separate machine tools

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

Components are designed with universal functionality to serve dual purposes. For example, the single tool can be positioned to machine either the first workpiece or the second workpiece, and the control system manages both workpiece mounts and tool operations, reducing the need for duplicate components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If two separate machine tools are used to machine two workpieces simultaneously, then the output rate is maintained, but the power consumption and coolant usage are doubled

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoutput rateVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the power and resource requirements of two machine tools into a single system. A single motor drives the tool, and a single coolant system serves both workpiece processing zones, thereby reducing total power consumption and coolant usage while maintaining the capability to process two workpieces simultaneously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Area of stationary object

If a single machine tool machines two workpieces simultaneously, then the footprint is reduced, but the control complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovefootprintVSAvoidcontrol complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller incorporates feedback mechanisms to monitor and coordinate the positions and operations of the first and second workpiece mounts as well as the tool. This feedback system enables the controller to manage the increased complexity of simultaneous dual workpiece machining by continuously adjusting parameters based on real-time conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The machine tool achieves up to twice the output rate of finished workpieces with a smaller footprint, reduced component and material usage, lower power consumption, and decreased operator time, while maintaining flexibility in machining modes and tool configurations.

Implementation Method 1

In abrasive or grinding machining processes, the material is removed by a tool which may be in the form of a rotating grinding wheel

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbrasion: Abrasion

Data Source

PatentUS20250041945A1Machine tool for machining workpieces and methods of operation thereof
Publication Date: 2025.02.06 FIVES LANDIS
  • US20250041945A1 patent drawing
  • US20250041945A1 patent drawing
  • US20250041945A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A machine tool for machining two workpieces comprises a machine base, a first tool mount, first and second workpiece mounts with respective drives, and a controller arranged to control the first and second workpiece mount drives so as to bring first and second workpieces carried by the first and second workpiece mounts, respectively, into engagement with a tool carried by the first tool mount.