Dual Writer Head Design for Interlaced Magnetic Recording

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In magnetic data storage, as cell size decreases to increase data storage density, writing data to smaller cells with larger write poles can affect adjacent cells' polarization, leading to performance setbacks and manufacturing challenges, particularly in interlaced magnetic recording systems where track widths and write pole placement are critical.

Innovation Solution

A transducer head with two writers of different sizes, separated in the down-track direction, allows for independent operation to write data tracks of varying widths, facilitating interlaced magnetic recording by generating magnetic fields that polarize regions of different sizes, thereby improving areal bit density and reducing cross-track separation for enhanced device performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If a larger write pole is used to write data to smaller cells, then data storage density is improved, but adjacent cells' polarization is affected (overwriting)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata storage densityVSAvoidadjacent cells polarization interference
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The write pole is segmented into multiple independent write elements (first write element, second write element, third write element) with different widths. Each write element can be independently activated to write to specific track regions, allowing precise control over the written area and preventing interference with adjacent cells that would occur with a single large write pole.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the storage medium are written using write elements with locally optimized properties. The first write element has a narrower width suitable for writing to outer tracks, while the second and third write elements have wider widths suitable for inner tracks. This local quality matching ensures optimal write performance without affecting adjacent cells.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Adaptability or versatility

If writers with two differently-sized write poles are used to create tracks of different write widths, then interlaced magnetic recording is enabled, but manufacturing challenges arise regarding write pole placement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterlaced magnetic recording capabilityVSAvoidwrite pole placement precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple write elements with different widths are merged into a single integrated write pole structure. This unified structure is manufactured as one piece, eliminating the need for separate placement of multiple write poles and thereby resolving the manufacturing challenges associated with precise write pole placement while maintaining interlaced magnetic recording capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The integrated write pole structure serves multiple functions by incorporating write elements of different widths within a single structure. This universal design enables the system to write to tracks of varying widths without requiring separate write poles, simplifying manufacturing while maintaining versatility for interlaced magnetic recording.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Device complexity

If a single writer is used, then device complexity is reduced, but areal bit density cannot be sufficiently improved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransducer head structureVSAvoidareal bit density
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The single writer is segmented into multiple write elements (first, second, and third write elements) with different widths, each capable of writing to specific track regions. This segmentation increases areal bit density by enabling more efficient space utilization while maintaining a relatively simple integrated structure that avoids excessive device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The write elements are arranged in the cross-track dimension with different widths, allowing the system to write to tracks of varying widths. This dimensional arrangement increases areal bit density without significantly increasing device complexity, as all elements are integrated within a single write pole structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration enhances data storage density and performance by allowing for precise control over write pole placement, minimizing cross-track separation, and maintaining readability of data tracks, even as they overlap, thus overcoming the limitations of conventional recording techniques.

Implementation Method 1

two writers separated from one another in a down-track direction of a data track on the storage medium... generating magnetic fields that polarize regions of different sizes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field generation: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS10210891B1Dual writer head design utilizing two writers of different sizes for writing interlaced data tracks
Publication Date: 2019.02.19 SEAGATE TECH LLC
  • US10210891B1 patent drawing
  • US10210891B1 patent drawing
  • US10210891B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A storage device includes a storage medium and a transducer head with two writers positioned to write to a same surface of the storage medium. The two writers are separated from one another along a down-track direction of a data track on the storage medium and independently controllable to write data.