Fire-Protected Duct Cladding With Air Gap for Hot Smoke Tightness

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing passive fire protection systems for air intake and flue extraction ducts face challenges such as weight, bulk, and installation complexity, while also failing to ensure insulation and hot smoke tightness, especially at critical points like fire-rated walls, posing a risk of fire propagation.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising a covering layer of non-combustible material with spacing elements and a perforated surface, creating an air gap for thermal exchange, using materials like stone wool and galvanized steel, to provide insulation and hot smoke tightness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If rigid calcium silicate or plasterboard panels are used to cover the duct, then fire protection is improved, but weight and bulk increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefire protectionVSAvoidweight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses a composite structure combining a non-combustible covering layer (mineral wool or stone wool) with a metal mesh layer and spacing elements to create a lightweight yet effective fire protection system. This composite approach replaces heavy rigid panels with materials that provide equivalent or superior fire protection at reduced weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The invention employs flexible mineral wool or stone wool covering layers that can conform to duct surfaces, replacing rigid heavy panels. These flexible layers provide fire protection while being significantly lighter and easier to install, addressing both the fire protection requirement and the weight reduction goal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

2Reliability

If thicker insulation panels are used, then fire protection is improved, but installation complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefire protectionVSAvoidinstallation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The fire protection system is divided into modular components: a covering layer, spacing elements, and a metal mesh layer. This segmentation allows each component to be independently installed and positioned, simplifying the overall installation process compared to handling single thick panels, while maintaining effective fire protection through the layered structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of increasing thickness in one dimension, the invention distributes fire protection functionality across multiple thin layers in different dimensions. The covering layer provides insulation, spacing elements create air gaps for thermal break, and the mesh provides structural support, achieving fire protection without requiring excessive thickness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Reliability

If fire dampers are installed in the duct, then fire propagation is prevented, but air passage is blocked during fire

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefire propagation preventionVSAvoidair passage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The metal mesh layer acts as an intermediary that allows air to pass through while providing fire protection. The mesh structure permits airflow continuity needed for pressurization and smoke extraction systems, yet prevents flame and hot smoke propagation, resolving the contradiction between maintaining air passage and preventing fire spread.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The metal mesh layer functions as a porous structure that allows gas (air) to pass through while blocking the propagation of flames and hot smoke. This porous approach maintains the air passage functionality required for fire safety systems while achieving fire propagation prevention, unlike solid fire dampers that completely block airflow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system ensures effective insulation and hot smoke tightness, preventing fire propagation through ducts, simplifying installation and reducing logistical and cost issues.

Implementation Method 1

An air gap 5 is thus formed between the covering layer 2 and the wire mesh 4, thanks to the presence of the spacing elements, which allows thermal exchange and consequently the maintenance of the correct temperature in the environment external to the duct

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal exchange: Convection

Implementation Method 2

a covering layer of at least non-combustible material 2, spacing elements 3, and an external perforated surface 4

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal insulation: Thermal Insulation

Data Source

PatentEP4696916A1System for passive fire protection for air intake ducts or flue extraction ducts
Publication Date: 2026.02.18 AF SYSTEMS SOCIETÁ PER AZIONI
  • EP4696916A1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4696916A1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP4696916A1 patent drawing

AI summary

System for passive fire protection for an air intake/flue extraction duct, characterized in that it provides spacing elements between a covering layer of at least non-combustible material of said duct and a perforated surface covering said duct.