Ducted Fan Active Flow Control for Boundary Layer Separation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Ducted-fan and fan-in-wing aircraft face limitations in hover and forward flight due to boundary layer separation, longitudinal momentum drag, and nose-up pitching moments, which affect thrust generation, efficiency, and stability control.

Innovation Solution

An active flow control system is introduced, featuring suction outlets and injection inlets within the duct, where suction outlets are positioned beneath the fan blades to passively or actively remove air, and injection inlets provide air into the duct inlet section, optimizing aerodynamic flow by managing air circulation and momentum.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If boundary layer separation is present on the blade surface, then thrust generation is reduced and efficiency is lost, but adding active flow control systems increases device complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethrust generationVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies pneumatic principles by using air suction outlets and air injection inlets to control boundary layer separation. The suction outlets remove air from the diffuser section to prevent flow separation, while injection inlets add air to the inlet section to enhance flow attachment, both resolving the thrust-efficiency contradiction through fluid dynamic control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes flow parameters by controlling pressure and velocity distributions through suction and injection. By adjusting the suction pressure in the diffuser section and injection pressure in the inlet section, the system optimizes boundary layer behavior to maintain high thrust generation while managing the complexity through parameter-based control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of energy

If flow separation occurs in the duct diffuser section, then propulsive efficiency is reduced, but adding suction outlets increases manufacturing complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepropulsive efficiencyVSAvoidease of manufacture
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts air from the duct diffuser section through suction outlets positioned at specific locations. By removing air at controlled rates, the system prevents flow separation and maintains propulsive efficiency. The suction outlets are integrated into the duct structure to minimize manufacturing complexity while achieving the desired flow control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Force

If longitudinal momentum drag increases in forward flight, then thrust generation is reduced, but adding flow control systems increases device complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethrust generationVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses air injection as an intermediary to manage momentum drag. By injecting air into the inlet section, the system creates a protective layer that reduces the adverse effects of momentum drag during forward flight. This intermediary approach maintains thrust generation while avoiding more complex active control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Stability of the object's composition

If nose-up pitching moment occurs in forward flight, then stability control is compromised, but adding flow control systems increases device complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestability controlVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback-based flow control system where sensors detect flow conditions and control systems adjust suction and injection rates accordingly. This feedback mechanism maintains stability control by counteracting nose-up pitching moments while keeping device complexity manageable through automated regulation rather than mechanical adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The active flow control system significantly enhances thrust and propulsive efficiency, reducing peak efficiency loss and improving stability, with up to 55% increase in maximum system thrust in hover and improved performance in forward flight.

Implementation Method 1

The at least one suction outlet is in the duct diffuser section and is configured to passively bleed or actively remove air from within the duct

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSuction: Suction

Implementation Method 2

injection inlets provide air into the duct inlet section, optimizing aerodynamic flow by managing air circulation and momentum

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure Gradient: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 3

a fan, and at least one suction outlet. The duct has a duct wall defining a duct inlet section and a duct diffuser section. The fan is within the duct and has a center body and a plurality of blades configured to rotate around the center body

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpeller: Impeller

Data Source

PatentUS11485486B2Active flow control for ducted fans and fan-in-wing configurations
Publication Date: 2022.11.01 UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO
  • US11485486B2 patent drawing
  • US11485486B2 patent drawing
  • US11485486B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, methods, lift fans, and aircraft involving active flow control of a ducted fan or fan-in-wing configuration are described.