Dump Body Modular Troughs Nested Transport

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for manufacturing vehicle dump body assemblies are inefficient in terms of cost and handling, as they require complex production processes and high transport costs due to the need for disassembly and reassembly of components during production.

Innovation Solution

The method involves prefabricating partial troughs with side walls and floors in the first production stage, omitting the rear part and front wall, allowing for efficient stacking and transport, and attaching these components using cold joining connections in the second production stage, enabling cost-effective production and reduced complexity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the dump body is produced as a fully assembled unit at one location, then the structural integrity and welding quality are improved, but the transport costs and logistics complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidtransport volume
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The dump body is divided into modular components (trough, rear part, front wall, subframe) that can be produced separately at different locations and assembled later. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized for its production location while reducing transport requirements compared to moving a complete assembled unit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The trough components are designed with nested geometry where the tapered shape allows one trough to be placed inside another during transport. This nesting arrangement significantly reduces the volume occupied by multiple troughs during logistics operations while maintaining structural integrity of each individual component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Quantity of substance

If the dump body components are transported disassembled to reduce transport costs, then the transport efficiency is improved, but the assembly complexity and production time at the second location increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransport volumeVSAvoidassembly process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Critical assembly operations such as welding and anti-corrosion coating are performed on components at the first production location before transport. This preliminary action ensures that time-consuming and quality-critical operations are completed when production facilities are available, reducing the assembly workload and complexity at the second location.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The assembly process is segmented into two distinct production locations with clearly defined tasks. The first location handles component fabrication and primary assembly operations, while the second location focuses on final assembly and installation. This segmentation of the assembly process reduces complexity at each individual location.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Strength

If welding is performed at the second production location to assemble components, then the structural strength is improved, but the production costs and process complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvejoint strengthVSAvoidproduction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

Welding operations are performed as preliminary actions at the first production location during component fabrication, rather than as final assembly operations at the second location. This timing optimization reduces production costs by utilizing available welding resources earlier in the manufacturing process and simplifying the second location's assembly operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Productivity

If the trough is designed with vertical side walls for easy stacking, then the stacking efficiency is improved, but the structural stability and anti-tip performance deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestacking efficiencyVSAvoidstructural stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The trough is designed with asymmetric geometry where the side walls are tapered (inclined) rather than vertical. This asymmetric design provides two benefits: it creates mechanical interlocking when troughs are stacked, improving structural stability and preventing tipping, while still allowing for efficient stacking arrangements due to the regular geometric pattern of the taper.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Data Source

PatentEP2384288B1Dump body for vehicles and corresponding manufacturing method
Publication Date: 2013.10.02 SCHMITZ CARGOBULL GOTHA
  • EP2384288B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2384288B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP2384288B1 patent drawingFigure 5~10

AI summary

A novel structure of a dump body arrangement for a vehicle, a method for producing a dump body arrangement including a intermediate transportation step, and a system comprising dump body arrangements that can be adjusted to various uses are described.