Duplex Array Ground-Truth Generation With Interactive Cell Reclassification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for generating ground-truth data for digital pathology images are labor-intensive, time-consuming, and resource-intensive, particularly for multiplex assays like duplex immunohistochemistry, due to the difficulty in collecting and labeling diverse and privacy-constrained medical images, and existing deep-learning models struggle to generalize across different image domains and user inputs.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method using a deep learning model for interactive segmentation of digital pathology images, combined with a graphical user interface, allows users to efficiently update cell classifications and region labels, enabling rapid and accurate segmentation and classification of cells in multiplex assays, even across different domains, by leveraging multi-class training data and click annotations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual segmentation and classification by pathologists is used, then accuracy of cell classification is improved, but time consumption and labor intensity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of cell classificationVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

A deep learning model serves as an intermediary between the digital pathology image and the final classification result. The model is trained on multi-class training data with click annotations to automatically perform segmentation and classification, acting as a mediator that reduces the need for manual pathologist review while maintaining high accuracy through learned patterns from diverse training data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary segmentation and classification using the trained deep learning model before any manual review. This preliminary action processes the entire image automatically, identifying candidate regions and classifications that can then be quickly verified or corrected by pathologists, rather than requiring manual analysis of every cell from scratch.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If deep learning models are trained with large datasets, then model accuracy and generalization improve, but data collection and labeling become more difficult due to privacy constraints

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel generalizationVSAvoiddata collection difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The deep learning model is designed with multi-functionality to handle multiple types of digital pathology images including H&E stains, immunohistochemistry (IHC) images, and multiplex assays. By training on diverse multi-class training data covering different image domains and staining types, the model achieves universal applicability across various medical imaging tasks, reducing the need for separate models for each specific assay type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs parameter changes in the form of data augmentation and normalization techniques to adapt training data across different domains. By transforming and normalizing diverse input images with different staining protocols and scanner types, the model learns domain-invariant features that improve generalization without requiring equally diverse training data for each specific domain.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If random sampling is used to select training images, then data selection is simple, but training efficiency decreases as non-informative samples waste resources

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata selection simplicityVSAvoidtraining efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where the deep learning model's performance on validation data informs the selection of additional training samples. Samples that are most informative for improving model performance (e.g., edge cases, uncertain predictions) are selected for labeling and addition to the training set, creating a feedback loop that continuously improves training efficiency rather than using random sampling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Extent of automation

If deep learning models are applied to digital pathology images, then automation increases, but adaptability to different image domains and stains decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation levelVSAvoidadaptability to different domains
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The deep learning model is designed with universal architecture and training protocols that enable it to handle multiple image domains including H&E stains, immunohistochemistry (IHC) images, and multiplex assays. The model processes digital pathology images through standardized preprocessing and normalization, achieving high automation while maintaining adaptability across different staining types and scanner platforms through domain-invariant feature learning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20250385003A1Hybrid and accelerated ground-truth generation for duplex arrays
Publication Date: 2025.12.18 VENTANA MEDICAL SYSTEMS INC
  • US20250385003A1 patent drawing
  • US20250385003A1 patent drawing
  • US20250385003A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems can include: accessing a digital pathology image; generating, using a first machine-learning model, a segmented image that identifies at least: a predicted diseased region and a background region in the digital pathology image; detecting depictions of a set of cells in the digital pathology image; generating, using a second machine-learning model, a cell classification for each cell of the set of cells, wherein the cell classification is selected from a set of potential classifications that indicate which, if any, of a set of biomarkers are expressed in the cell; detecting that a subset of the set of cells are within the background region; and updating the cell classification for each cell of at least some cells in the subset to be a background classification that was not included in the set of potential classifications.