Duplex Tab Obstacles Reduce DDT Distance in Pulse Detonation Combustors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Cyclic detonation devices face challenges in reducing the distance required for deflagration-to-detonation transition (DDT) due to high pressure drop and cooling requirements, while existing obstacles either increase pressure drop or reduce run-up to detonation.

Innovation Solution

The use of duplex tab obstacles with compound radial and circumferential inclination on the inner surface of the detonation chamber enhances turbulence and flame acceleration, facilitating the DDT process with minimal pressure loss.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If internal obstacles are used to reduce DDT distance, then the deflagration-to-detonation transition distance is reduced, but the pressure drop increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveDDT distanceVSAvoidpressure drop
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The obstacle is segmented into a duplex tab structure with two inclined surfaces divided into multiple zones. The first inclined surface has a first zone and second zone, while the second inclined surface has a third zone and fourth zone. This segmentation allows different regions to serve different functions in turbulence generation and flame acceleration, reducing the overall DDT distance while managing pressure drop through distributed rather than concentrated obstruction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The obstacle utilizes compound radial and circumferential inclination, adding dimensional complexity to the flow interaction. The tabs are oriented at specific angles relative to the radial and circumferential directions, creating three-dimensional flow patterns that enhance turbulence more effectively than simple axial obstacles, thereby reducing DDT distance without proportionally increasing pressure drop.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Loss of time

If internal obstacles are used to reduce DDT distance, then the deflagration-to-detonation transition distance is reduced, but cooling requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveDDT distanceVSAvoidcooling requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The duplex tab obstacle structure is designed to be self-cooling through its geometry and flow interaction. The inclined surfaces and multiple zones create flow patterns that promote natural convection and heat dissipation. The obstacle utilizes the high-velocity flow itself to provide cooling, eliminating the need for separate active cooling systems while maintaining the reduced DDT distance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Loss of time

If shaped-wall features are used, then run-up to detonation is reduced and pressure drop is minimized, but the structural integration with cooling is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverun-up to detonationVSAvoidstructural integration
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The duplex tab obstacle merges the flow control function with the structural wall integration. The tabs are directly attached to the chamber wall, combining the obstacle function with the wall structure. This integration allows the shaped-wall features to reduce run-up to detonation while the unified structure simplifies the overall design compared to separate obstacle and cooling system components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration effectively accelerates turbulent flames into detonation waves with reduced pressure losses, improving the efficiency and performance of the DDT process in pulse detonation combustors.

Implementation Method 1

The plurality of duplex tab obstacles are configured having compound radial and circumferential inclination therein to enhance a turbulence of a fluid flow and flame acceleration through the detonation chamber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTurbulence: Turbulence

Implementation Method 2

The plurality of duplex tab obstacles are disposed on at least a portion of an inner surface of the detonation chamber between an inlet and an outlet to enhance a turbulence of a fluid flow and flame acceleration through the detonation chamber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlame acceleration: Deflagration

Data Source

PatentUS8881500B2Duplex tab obstacles for enhancement of deflagration-to-detonation transition
Publication Date: 2014.11.11 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO
  • US8881500B2 patent drawing
  • US8881500B2 patent drawing
  • US8881500B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A detonation chamber for a pulse detonation combustor including: a plurality of duplex tab obstacles disposed on at least a portion of an inner surface of the detonation chamber wherein the plurality of duplex tab obstacles enhance a turbulence of a fluid flow through the detonation chamber.