Dynamic Access Permission Control via Usage Evaluation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Electronic devices face challenges in effectively controlling and limiting access permissions granted to applications, leading to potential security risks due to applications requesting more permissions than necessary and difficulties in revoking previously granted permissions.

Innovation Solution

An electronic device evaluates access permissions using various criteria, generating notifications to inform users about granting or denying permissions, with evaluations based on historical usage and category-specific algorithms, employing both external and internal machine-learning analyses to improve reliability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If applications are granted broad access permissions to function properly, then application functionality is improved, but security risk increases due to potential personal information leakage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplication functionalityVSAvoidsecurity risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically changes permission parameters based on application behavior patterns. Instead of granting fixed broad permissions, the system adjusts permission scope and duration according to actual usage needs detected through monitoring, transforming static permission allocation into dynamic parameter adjustment that balances functionality and security

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where application permission usage is monitored, evaluated against baseline patterns, and used to adjust future permission decisions. The notification system provides feedback to users about permission requests based on historical behavior analysis, enabling informed permission management that prevents excessive permission granting while maintaining necessary functionality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If users are provided with detailed permission control options, then permission management capability is improved, but user operation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepermission management capabilityVSAvoidoperation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs automatic permission evaluation and risk assessment without requiring users to manually analyze each permission request. The machine learning model automatically monitors application behavior, evaluates permission necessity, and generates contextualized notifications, allowing users to benefit from sophisticated analysis without bearing the complexity of implementing it themselves

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The notification system acts as an intermediary between the complex permission control mechanisms and the user. It translates technical permission requests into user-friendly risk assessments and recommendations, mediating between detailed permission control capabilities and simple user interaction by presenting only the most relevant information in an accessible format

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If permission monitoring and evaluation systems are implemented, then security control is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity controlVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The permission control system is segmented into distinct functional modules: behavior monitoring components that collect data, machine learning evaluation components that analyze patterns, and notification components that present results to users. This segmentation allows each module to be optimized independently and reduces overall system complexity by creating manageable, specialized components rather than a monolithic complex system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12153715B2Method for controlling permission of application and electronic device supporting the same
Publication Date: 2024.11.26 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US12153715B2 patent drawing
  • US12153715B2 patent drawing
  • US12153715B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An electronic device and permission control method are disclosed. The electronic device includes a display, a communication circuitry, a memory and a processor. The processor implements the method, including: receiving a first evaluation regarding usage of an access permission by at least one application from a server, via the communication circuitry, generating usage information indicating historical usage of the access permission by the at least one application, generating a second evaluation of the access permission granted to the at least one application, based at least on the usage information, determining an evaluation result based on at least one of the first evaluation or the second evaluation, and determining whether to display a user notification regarding the access permission, based on the evaluation result.