Dynamic Activation Behavior for Graphical Ad Displays

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Inadvertent user interactions with graphical advertisement displays, such as mis-clicks or mis-taps, lead to unnecessary costs for advertisers as users unintentionally activate ads, reducing the effectiveness of advertising campaigns.

Innovation Solution

A system that dynamically modifies the activation behavior of graphical advertisement displays based on user interaction history and characteristics, selecting alternative activation behaviors to prevent unintended interactions, such as displaying a confirmation window or CAPTCHA request, instead of immediate redirection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the advertisement display is configured with a default activation behavior to activate by default when clicked or tapped, then the activation process is simple and fast, but inadvertent activations occur leading to higher costs and reduced effectiveness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactivation speedVSAvoidintentional activation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of user interaction characteristics and historical data before determining whether to activate the advertisement. It pre-evaluates multiple potential activation behaviors and selects the most appropriate one in advance, rather than simply executing the default activation behavior upon any click or tap event.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The activation behavior is made dynamic rather than static. The system adapts the activation behavior based on real-time analysis of user interaction characteristics, device type, historical data, and contextual factors. This allows the system to switch between different activation strategies (immediate activation, delayed activation, confirmation required, etc.) to optimize both speed and accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If the system implements analysis of user interaction history and characteristics to determine intentional activation, then the accuracy of activation determination improves, but the system complexity and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser intent detection accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the activation determination process into multiple independent analysis components: interaction history analysis, device characteristics analysis, contextual analysis, and behavior pattern recognition. Each component processes specific aspects of user interaction separately and contributes to the overall determination, making the complex system more manageable and efficient.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary analysis layer between the user interaction event and the activation decision. This intermediary component evaluates multiple factors (interaction history, device type, contextual data) and translates them into a determined activation behavior, acting as a mediator that simplifies the decision-making process while improving accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If the system displays confirmation windows or CAPTCHA requests to verify user intent, then inadvertent activations are reduced, but the user experience and activation speed are degraded

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintentional activation accuracyVSAvoiduser interaction simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different quality levels of verification to different users and contexts rather than uniformly requiring confirmation for all activations. Based on the analysis of user interaction characteristics and historical data, the system locally adapts the activation process - applying strict verification only when necessary and allowing simple activation when user intent is clearly established, thus optimizing both reliability and ease of operation for each specific case.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS10922715B2Dynamically modifying activation behavior of a computerized graphical advertisement display
Publication Date: 2021.02.16 CRITEO TECH SAS
  • US10922715B2 patent drawing
  • US10922715B2 patent drawing
  • US10922715B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A server computing device receives a request for graphical display source code for a computerized graphical advertisement display. The server generates the source code comprising a plurality of activation behaviors for the display, where upon generation the display is associated with a default activation behavior. A client computing device and captures a user interaction event for the display, the user interaction event associated with a user. The client determines whether the user intended to activate the display via the captured event, based upon characteristics of the user interaction event, characteristics of the computerized graphical advertisement display, characteristics of the client computing device, and an interaction history with other graphical advertisement displays. The client selects an activation behavior in the source code based upon the determination. The client changes the default activation behavior for the display to the selected activation behavior and executes the selected activation behavior.