Dynamic Advertisement Budget Allocation via Response Extrapolation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Fixed budget allocation for advertisements over an advertisement period can be inflexible and inefficient, failing to match actual user responses, leading to overspending or underperformance in achieving response targets.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a server that allocates a budget to advertisement opportunities by measuring user responses during initial subperiods, extrapolating these responses to the entire period, and adjusting subsequent budget allocations to meet response targets, ensuring flexible and efficient allocation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If fixed budget allocation is used for advertisements over an advertisement period, then the allocation process is simple and predetermined, but the allocation becomes inflexible and inefficient, failing to match actual user responses

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of budget allocationVSAvoidadaptability to user response
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the static, fixed budget allocation into a dynamic system that continuously adapts based on real-time user response data. The allocation mechanism adjusts budget distribution across subperiods and advertisement opportunities based on measured performance metrics, enabling the system to respond flexibly to changing user behavior while maintaining automated control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Loss of time

If budget is allocated in fixed increments over advertisement subperiods in advance, then the allocation is predetermined and simple to manage, but the actual user response does not match projections, leading to overspending or underperformance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetime for allocation adjustmentVSAvoidreliability of response target achievement
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where user response data measured during each subperiod is fed back into the allocation system. This feedback loop enables continuous refinement of budget allocation decisions, comparing actual performance against projections and adjusting subsequent allocations to stay on track for achieving response targets, thereby improving reliability without significant time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If advertiser manually monitors and adjusts budget allocation based on updated estimations, then some flexibility is achieved, but the adjustments may fail to promote advertiser targets, resulting in overspending or inefficient resource use

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility in budget adjustmentVSAvoidefficiency of resource use
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables the allocation system to serve itself by automatically measuring user responses, analyzing performance data, and adjusting budget allocations without requiring manual advertiser intervention. This self-service capability ensures consistent, data-driven decisions that optimize resource efficiency while maintaining the flexibility to adapt to real-time performance variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Quantity of substance

If increased budget allocation is made during a subperiod with historically favorable user response, then the advertiser may overspend without achieving proportional increase in user response

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebudget allocation quantityVSAvoidreturn on advertising spend
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by making proportional rather than excessive budget adjustments. When user response is favorable in a subperiod, the system increases allocation moderately to capture additional value without overspending. The adjustment is calibrated based on the measured performance and remaining budget, ensuring that increased spend translates to proportional gains in user response and maintains efficient resource utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20200211057A1Extrapolated allocation of advertisement budgets
Publication Date: 2020.07.02 YAHOO AD TECH LLC
  • US20200211057A1 patent drawing
  • US20200211057A1 patent drawing
  • US20200211057A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Advertisement budgets are often apportioned over an advertisement period, such as apportioning fixed increments of the budget over subperiods of the advertisement period. Each allocation of the budget may be used for auctions of advertisement opportunities during the subperiod. However, fixed apportioning may not be responsive to the actual user response, and manual adjustment of the budget may provide an efficient allocation in view of an advertiser's response target, resulting in overspending, underspending (wherein resulting user response fails to meet a response target), and/or inefficient allocation of the budget. Instead, a server may measure the user response during a first advertisement subperiod, extrapolate the user response over the advertisement period, and compare the extrapolated user response to the response target. Based on the comparison, budget allocation during a second advertisement subperiod may be adjusted by an allocation offset that adapts the allocation of the advertisement budget to the response target.