Dynamic Ad Pricing System Using Performance-Based Traffic Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing advertising models either lack predictability for advertisers or fail to maximize value for publishers and networks, with auction-based systems disrupting clear contracts and simplistic pricing models not accounting for varying ad traffic value.

Innovation Solution

A system that classifies ad traffic into performance groups based on metrics, allowing for variable pricing between a minimum and maximum CPC, ensuring ads are priced according to their performance and the value of the traffic they generate, while maintaining profitability for publishers and networks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If auction-based models are used to maximize ad space value, then publisher revenue is improved, but advertiser predictability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepublisher revenueVSAvoidadvertiser predictability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts ad pricing and selection based on real-time performance metrics and market conditions. Advertisers can set minimum and maximum CPC ranges, and the system adaptively selects optimal prices within these ranges based on traffic value classification and auction outcomes, allowing both publisher revenue maximization and advertiser budget control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes pricing parameters from fixed CPM or CPC to variable CPC within defined ranges. Advertisers specify minimum and maximum CPC values, and the actual price is dynamically determined based on traffic classification, auction results, and performance metrics, providing both flexibility and predictability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If fixed CPM or CPC models are used, then advertiser predictability is improved, but publisher value maximization deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadvertiser predictabilityVSAvoidpublisher revenue
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static fixed pricing to dynamic pricing within advertiser-defined ranges. The actual CPC is determined by multiple factors including traffic classification, auction outcomes, and performance metrics, allowing publisher revenue to fluctuate with market value while advertisers maintain control through minimum and maximum constraints

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments ad traffic into different performance groups based on classification metrics, allowing different pricing strategies for different traffic types. This enables publishers to maximize value from high-performance traffic while maintaining predictability for advertisers across various traffic segments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Device complexity

If simplistic pricing models are used, then system complexity is reduced, but ad traffic value classification deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepricing system complexityVSAvoidad traffic value classification
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments ad traffic into distinct performance groups based on classification metrics such as click-through rate, conversion rate, and user engagement. This segmentation enables precise value classification without requiring overly complex pricing models, as each segment can be handled with standardized pricing rules

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary classification layer that translates complex traffic performance data into simplified performance groups. This intermediary structure enables accurate traffic value classification while keeping the pricing mechanism relatively simple, as the classification layer handles the complexity of metric analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10672039B2Assembling internet display pages with content provided from multiple servers after failure of one server
Publication Date: 2020.06.02 PULSEPOINT INC
  • US10672039B2 patent drawing
  • US10672039B2 patent drawing
  • US10672039B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Presented are embodiments of methods and systems that provide for Internet advertisement pricing and placement to be variably based on the advertisement's performance within a given category of Internet media, while at the same time achieving predictable delivery and pricing for both advertisers and publishers. Techniques are presented where an advertiser's online campaign will be pre-empted only for underperformance on its own merits, and not for its relative performance or price versus other advertisers. Further, techniques are presented for allowing publishers of advertisements to realize increased revenue from their high value media while using tag passbacks to secure a minimum reserve pricing of their choice.