Dynamic AI Verification Workflows for Risk-Based Object Inspection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional workflow management systems lack adaptability, requiring technical expertise for updates, failing to tailor user experiences, and lacking integrated AI capabilities for physical object verification, leading to inefficiencies and increased costs.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for remotely configuring and deploying AI-guided, multi-step data capture workflows that allow non-technical administrators to define and execute workflows dynamically, supporting on-device AI models and risk-based adaptation, enabling real-time user interface rendering without application updates.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If workflows are hardcoded within the application binary, then the application structure is stable and reliable, but any updates to workflow configurations require full rebuild, quality assurance cycle, app store resubmission, and end-user app updates, resulting in high latency and slow realization of changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplication structure stabilityVSAvoidworkflow update latency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent separates workflow configurations from the application binary by implementing a remote workflow management system. Workflows are segmented into independent, remotely-updatable configuration files that can be modified without rebuilding the entire application. This allows the application binary to remain stable while workflow configurations are updated independently in real-time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a workflow engine as an intermediary layer between the application and workflow configurations. This mediator component loads and executes workflow definitions from remote sources, enabling updates without application reconstruction. The workflow engine acts as a buffer that maintains application stability while facilitating rapid configuration changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Device complexity

If all users undergo the same workflow steps regardless of risk level, then the system is simple to implement, but it introduces unnecessary friction for low-risk users and fails to adequately verify high-risk ones, compromising user experience and fraud resilience

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworkflow configuration simplicityVSAvoidfraud resilience
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic workflow adaptation based on user risk profiles. The system automatically adjusts workflow complexity and verification steps according to assessed user risk levels. Low-risk users experience streamlined workflows with fewer steps, while high-risk users undergo more rigorous verification processes. This dynamic adjustment maintains fraud resilience while optimizing user experience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes workflow parameters such as number of steps, verification requirements, and data collection depth based on user risk assessment. The system dynamically modifies workflow configuration parameters to match the risk level of each user, enabling simple implementation for low-risk cases while maintaining strong fraud detection capabilities for high-risk cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If AI models are baked into the application as a monolithic component, then the application is easier to deploy, but it precludes fine-grained control and the ability to assign specific AI checks at individual workflow steps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplication deployment simplicityVSAvoidper-step AI model selection flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments AI model functionality into discrete, step-specific components rather than a monolithic integration. Each workflow step can be assigned specific AI models independently, allowing fine-grained control over which AI checks are applied where. This segmentation maintains deployment simplicity while enabling versatile, context-appropriate AI model selection for each workflow step.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal AI model repository that can serve multiple workflow steps with different requirements. The same AI infrastructure supports various model types and functions, providing both ease of deployment through a unified system and adaptability through configurable model assignment at each workflow step level.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Measurement precision

If technical developers author workflow configurations using design tools or scripting interfaces, then the configurations can be precise and controlled, but non-technical users cannot make timely adjustments, requiring development involvement for even minor updates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworkflow configuration precisionVSAvoidworkflow update accessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a visual workflow designer and administrative interface as intermediaries that enable non-technical users to create and modify workflow configurations. These tools provide user-friendly abstractions over the underlying configuration precision requirements, allowing business users to make timely adjustments without development involvement while maintaining configuration accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent empowers non-technical users with self-service capabilities to author and update workflow configurations independently. Through intuitive design tools and templates, users can make precise configuration changes without requiring developer assistance, enabling timely adjustments while maintaining the precision needed for reliable workflow execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20250358535A1System and method for ai-guided dynamic configuration and execution of multi-step object verification workflows
Publication Date: 2025.11.20 PROKTA INC
  • US20250358535A1 patent drawing
  • US20250358535A1 patent drawing
  • US20250358535A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a system for artificial intelligence (AI)-guided dynamic configuration and execution of multi-step object verification workflows. The system comprises a computing device operable in an administrator configuration mode for defining workflow definitions and in a user execution mode for initiating and executing workflows. The system supports receiving administrator-defined workflows comprising instructional metadata, validation requirements, and AI model references. Based on contextual identifiers such as user ID or fraud risk score, a session is initiated, and a workflow recipe is retrieved and rendered dynamically on the computing device without requiring application recompilation. The system validates user inputs using on-device AI models, determines workflow progression, and transmits validated data. Workflow variants, fallback logic, and contextual routing are supported. The system enables configurable, scalable, and AI-augmented object verification across various physical inspection use cases.