Dynamic Alarm Delay for Centrifugal Separator False Alarms

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Centrifugal separators in marine and power plant applications often trigger unnecessary alarms due to low volume flow of liquids, leading to prolonged filling and pressure increase, which exceeds the alarm delay duration, causing false alarms.

Innovation Solution

The method involves adjusting the volume flow of the liquid into the separator and optimizing the alarm delay duration based on the volume flow, ensuring earlier alarm triggering during high flow conditions and reducing false alarms during low flow conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a fixed alarm delay duration is used, then the alarm system is simple to operate, but false alarms occur during low volume flow conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealarm delay settingVSAvoidalarm accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The alarm delay duration is changed from a fixed value to a dynamic value that automatically adjusts based on the measured volume flow rate. The control system continuously monitors the volume flow and calculates the appropriate alarm delay duration, allowing the system to adapt to varying operating conditions without manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from the volume flow measurement to adjust the alarm delay duration. The control system measures the actual volume flow rate, compares it with reference values, and uses this information to determine the appropriate alarm delay, creating a closed-loop control system that improves alarm accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Speed

If the alarm delay is shortened to detect failures earlier, then failure detection speed improves, but false alarms increase during low volume flow conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefailure detection speedVSAvoidfalse alarm reduction
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The alarm delay duration dynamically adapts to the volume flow conditions. During high volume flow operations, the alarm delay is automatically shortened to enable faster failure detection, while during low volume flow conditions, the alarm delay is extended to prevent false alarms, thus resolving the contradiction between detection speed and false alarm reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the time parameter (alarm delay duration) based on the volume flow rate parameter. By establishing a relationship between these two parameters, the system automatically selects appropriate alarm delay values that optimize both failure detection speed and false alarm prevention for different operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the alarm delay is extended to avoid false alarms during low volume flow, then false alarm reduction improves, but failure detection is delayed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefalse alarm reductionVSAvoidfailure detection time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The alarm delay duration is dynamically adjusted based on real-time volume flow measurements. During low volume flow conditions, the alarm delay is extended to avoid false alarms, while during high volume flow conditions, the alarm delay is reduced to enable timely failure detection, thus resolving the contradiction between false alarm reduction and failure detection timing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system establishes a dynamic relationship between volume flow rate and alarm delay duration, changing the time parameter according to the flow conditions. This parameter adaptation ensures that the alarm delay is optimized for each operating condition, preventing both false alarms and delayed failure detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach optimizes the alarm delay duration, reducing false alarms during low volume flow conditions and ensuring timely alarm triggering during high volume flow, thereby improving the operational reliability of centrifugal separators.

Implementation Method 1

As the bowl rotates, the solids and/or the heavier liquid, i.e. the liquid having a higher density, are transferred into the outer part, the so-called sludge volume, of the bowl under the centrifugal force

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal force: Centrifugal Force

Data Source

PatentEP2170521B1Method of using a separator and a separator
Publication Date: 2017.04.19 WARTSILA FINLAND OY
  • EP2170521B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2170521B1 patent drawing
  • EP2170521B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A centrifugal separator and a method of using such a centrifugal separator (1) that comprises a bowl (2) for the liquid that is to be separated, the method comprising feeding the liquid to be separated into the bow (2), removing the separated liquid from the inner part (7) of the bowl, periodically removing slag from the outer pan (6) of the bowl during emptying cycles, measuring the pressure of the separated liquid that has been removed from the bowl (2), and triggering an alarm, if after the alarm delay subsequent to the emptying cycle, the pressure of the separated liquid that was removed from the bowl (2) is below a preset limit value. The volume flow of the liquid fed into the bowl (2) and separated is defined, and the duration of the alarm delay is adjusted on the basts of the volume flow of the liquid to be separated.