Dynamic Mobile App Interface Reorganization Based on Usage Patterns

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing Mobile Application Management (MAM) and Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) tools impose unnecessary burdens on users due to ill-defined security policies, negatively impacting productivity by requiring excessive security measures on mobile devices.

Innovation Solution

A method that detects invocations of native applications on a mobile device, determines usage patterns, and configures the user interface to present applications based on these patterns, enhancing user productivity while maintaining security.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If MAM/EMM tools implement strict security policies on mobile devices, then security is improved, but user productivity deteriorates due to unnecessary burdens

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoiduser productivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically changes security parameters (such as authentication requirements, encryption levels, or access restrictions) based on contextual factors like location, time, device state, or user behavior patterns. This allows security to be adapted to specific situations rather than applying uniform strict policies, thereby maintaining security while reducing unnecessary burdens on users during low-risk scenarios

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The security policies transition from static to dynamic, where the system continuously monitors device usage patterns, location, and contextual information to adjust security measures in real-time. This dynamic approach ensures that security is applied only when necessary, improving user productivity while maintaining adequate protection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If applications are arranged in fixed locations on the user interface, then ease of operation is improved for common tasks, but adaptability deteriorates when user needs change

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidadaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The application arrangement transitions from static to dynamic, with the system automatically reorganizing applications based on detected usage patterns. Frequently used applications are positioned in more accessible locations on the user interface, while less used applications are moved to less prominent positions. This dynamic reorganization adapts to changing user needs while maintaining ease of operation for current tasks

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-service by automatically monitoring and analyzing user application usage patterns, then autonomously reorganizing the user interface without requiring manual user intervention. This allows the interface to adapt to user needs automatically, improving both ease of operation and adaptability simultaneously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS10331308B2Arrangement of native applications on a mobile device user interface based on usage patterns
Publication Date: 2019.06.25 CA TECH INC
  • US10331308B2 patent drawing
  • US10331308B2 patent drawing
  • US10331308B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method includes performing operations as follows on a processor: detecting invocations of a plurality of native applications residing on a mobile device by a user through a user interface, determining usage patterns for the plurality of native applications based on the invocations by the user, and configuring the user interface to present the native applications for invocation based on the usage patterns that were determined.