Dynamic Application Assignment in Distributed Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for assigning applications in distributed systems are rigid and inflexible, leading to user discomfort and inefficiencies, particularly in mobile applications where local computing resources are limited and communication with remote resources requires time and energy.

Innovation Solution

A method and architecture that dynamically assign applications to local or remote application servers based on tolerance time, which is the maximum permissible latency threshold, allowing for flexible resource allocation and improved user experience by selecting the most efficient calculation environment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If applications are permanently assigned to local or remote application servers based on prioritization, then the system structure is simple and easy to manage, but the system becomes rigid and inflexible leading to user discomfort

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility of application assignmentVSAvoidcomplexity of assignment mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic application assignment by continuously monitoring round-trip times and automatically switching between local and remote application servers based on current performance conditions. The application manager dynamically adjusts assignment decisions rather than using permanent static assignments, allowing the system to adapt to changing network conditions and server performance while maintaining manageable complexity through automated control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Power

If applications are assigned to remote application servers, then computing power is increased, but communication time and energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputing powerVSAvoidcommunication time
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an application manager as an intermediary component that sits between the application client and the application servers. This mediator continuously monitors round-trip times to both local and remote servers and intelligently routes application execution to the appropriate server based on current conditions. The intermediary enables the system to access remote computing power when beneficial while minimizing communication time by switching to local execution when network conditions deteriorate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Speed

If applications are executed locally, then response time is reduced, but computing resources are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse speedVSAvoidcomputing resources
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal execution environment where applications can run on either local or remote application servers depending on conditions. The application client is designed to support both local and remote execution modes, making the system multi-functional. This universality allows the system to leverage local computing resources for fast response when needed while accessing remote computing power when additional capacity is required, effectively combining the advantages of both approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11363120B2Method for running an application on a distributed system architecture
Publication Date: 2022.06.14 VOLKSWAGEN AG
  • US11363120B2 patent drawing
  • US11363120B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for executing an application on a distributed system architecture having an application client for receiving input data and for providing output data; a local application server on the application client; at least one remote application server for receiving input data from the application client for processing input data for the application client and for returning processed input data to the application client; and an application manager for assigning the application to the local application server or to the at least one remote application server. The method includes determining a first round-trip time, determining a second round-trip time, determining a tolerance time for receiving and processing input data for the application, comparing the two round-trip times with the tolerance time, and assigning the application to the local application server or to the at least one remote application server based on the comparison.