Dynamic Approach Timing Display for Stable Aircraft Landings

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing aircraft approach and landing procedures are complicated by non-ideal conditions, requiring flight crews to perform actions under increased workload and stress, and there is a need for systems to efficiently indicate optimal timing for these actions to promote stable landings.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising a display device and controller that receives data on actions and recommended timings, dynamically indicating these on a display relative to the flight plan to ensure stable aircraft approach and landing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If flight crew manually determine optimal timing for approach actions, then they can adapt to non-ideal conditions, but workload and stress increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to non-ideal conditionsVSAvoidcrew workload
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically calculating and displaying optimal timing for approach actions based on real-time aircraft state and flight plan data. The controller autonomously processes information and generates visual cues, eliminating the need for manual calculation by flight crew and significantly reducing their workload while maintaining adaptability to varying conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring aircraft state parameters and flight plan progress, then dynamically updating visual displays to show optimal timing for actions. This closed-loop feedback mechanism ensures the system adapts to changing conditions in real-time while providing clear, actionable information to the flight crew without increasing their cognitive burden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of manufacture

If standard operating procedures are followed rigidly, then procedures are simple, but they cannot accommodate non-ideal conditions effectively

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocedure simplicityVSAvoidresponse to non-ideal conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies dynamics by transforming static standard procedures into dynamic, adaptive guidance. The visual display system continuously updates optimal timing indicators based on real-time aircraft state and flight plan progress, allowing procedures to automatically adapt to non-ideal conditions while maintaining simplicity for the flight crew who simply need to follow the displayed cues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters by dynamically adjusting timing parameters for approach actions based on current flight conditions. Instead of fixed procedural steps, the system calculates optimal timing parameters in real-time and displays them visually, enabling procedures to adapt to varying conditions while remaining easy to follow through automated parameter adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If actions are performed under increased workload and stress, then responses to non-ideal conditions improve, but error rates increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse to non-ideal conditionsVSAvoidaction execution accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically calculating optimal timing and displaying visual cues, which reduces flight crew workload and stress. This automation maintains high adaptability to non-ideal conditions while improving reliability by eliminating errors associated with manual calculation and reducing cognitive load that could lead to mistakes under stress.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback through continuous monitoring and dynamic visual display updates, providing clear guidance that reduces stress and improves action execution accuracy. The closed-loop feedback mechanism ensures reliable response to non-ideal conditions by continuously adapting guidance based on real-time aircraft state while maintaining low workload for the flight crew.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP4618059A1Systems and methods for promoting stable aircraft approach conditions
Publication Date: 2025.09.17 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
  • EP4618059A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4618059A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4618059A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Systems and methods are provided for promoting stable aircraft approach conditions. The system comprises a display device that is onboard an aircraft and a controller in communication with the display device. The controller is configured to, by a processor: receive data that includes information relating to an action configured to stabilize an approach of the aircraft during landing thereof and a recommended timing of performing the action relative to a predetermined flight plan of the aircraft, and render a first visual element on the display device that is configured to display the action relative to the flight plan and dynamically indicate the recommended timing of performing the action relative to a geographic position of the aircraft along the flight plan.