Dynamic Asset Management Interfaces for Automated Repayment Transfers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional asset management systems are rigid, inefficient, and require multiple user interactions to manage digital assets and account management, lacking flexibility and computational efficiency, particularly in aligning accounts with dynamic asset transfers and repayment obligations.

Innovation Solution

An intelligent asset management system that generates dynamic user interface elements, allowing users to select from various asset repayment models, monitors accounts for post-deadline transfers, and applies an asset allocation hierarchy to automatically initiate transfers based on user preferences and account conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional systems use fixed schedules for asset transfers, then transfer timing is predictable and simple to manage, but the system lacks flexibility to adapt to dynamic account conditions and post-deadline transfers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility in asset transfer timingVSAvoidcomplexity of transfer management system
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static fixed-schedule transfers to dynamic transfers that automatically adjust based on real-time account conditions. The intelligent asset management system monitors account balances, incoming transfers, and deadlines dynamically, enabling transfer timing to adapt flexibly to changing conditions without requiring complex manual reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements self-service functionality where the asset management system automatically determines optimal transfer timing based on monitored account conditions, eliminating the need for manual intervention or complex user configuration. The system serves itself by autonomously adjusting transfer schedules according to detected post-deadline transfers and account states.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Ease of operation

If conventional systems require multiple user interfaces and interactions to manage assets, then comprehensive control is achieved, but user effort and computing resource consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of user interactions requiredVSAvoidcomputing resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables users to set up intelligent asset management with minimal initial interaction, after which the system autonomously monitors accounts, detects post-deadline transfers, and executes transfers according to the asset allocation hierarchy. This self-service approach dramatically reduces both the number of user interactions required and the computing resources consumed compared to conventional systems that require continuous manual input.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system requires users to perform preliminary configuration of repayment models and asset allocation hierarchies once, before the system automatically handles all subsequent transfer decisions. This preliminary setup eliminates the need for repeated user interactions and reduces ongoing computing resource consumption by pre-establishing the decision-making framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Loss of information

If conventional systems provide limited analysis of account information, then system complexity is reduced, but the ability to make intelligent transfer decisions is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedepth of account information analysisVSAvoidcomplexity of analysis system
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments account information analysis into distinct functional modules: monitoring incoming transfers, detecting post-deadline transfers, evaluating asset sufficiency, and determining transfer priorities. This segmentation enables comprehensive information analysis while managing system complexity through modular architecture, where each module handles a specific aspect of the analysis independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary intelligent analysis layer between raw account data and transfer execution decisions. This intermediary layer processes account information, applies the selected repayment model logic, and generates transfer instructions, thereby enabling deep information analysis without directly exposing the full complexity of the analysis system to users or execution components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Productivity

If conventional systems execute transfers according to fixed schedules, then computational resources are conserved through simplicity, but the system cannot respond to post-deadline transfers or dynamic account conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveefficiency of asset transfer managementVSAvoidcomputing resource usage
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements periodic monitoring of account conditions at strategically determined intervals rather than continuous monitoring. The intelligent asset management system checks for post-deadline transfers and evaluates transfer opportunities at key moments (e.g., when transfers are detected, at deadline times), achieving high productivity while conserving computing resources by avoiding unnecessary continuous analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system establishes feedback loops where account conditions and incoming transfers are continuously monitored and fed back into the decision-making process. This feedback mechanism enables the system to respond efficiently to dynamic conditions, executing transfers only when warranted by actual account states, thereby optimizing productivity while avoiding wasteful computing resource consumption on unnecessary transfer evaluations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12423662B2Facilitating intelligent asset management utilizing graphical user interfaces comprising dynamic asset management user interface elements
Publication Date: 2025.09.23 CHIME FINANCIAL INC
  • US12423662B2 patent drawing
  • US12423662B2 patent drawing
  • US12423662B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to systems, non-transitory computer-readable media, and methods that, as part of an internetwork facilitation system, facilitate intelligent asset management through user interface elements that present selectable intelligent asset repayment models for user accounts. In particular, the systems can provide for display within a graphical user interface of a computing device corresponding to a user account, a selectable intelligent asset repayment element. Further, the systems can select an intelligent asset repayment model from a plurality of asset repayment models. Additionally, the systems can utilize the intelligent asset repayment model to transfer assets from the user account by: determining that the user account fails to satisfy an asset threshold corresponding to a deadline time, monitoring the user account for a post-deadline asset transfer; and in response to identifying the post-deadline asset transfer, initiating a digital transfer of assets from the user account according to an asset allocation hierarchy.