Dynamic Attribute Value Timing in Linked Application Workflows
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing information processing systems lack the ability to set attribute values dynamically during the execution of workflows, as some attributes' values cannot be set before the start of an operation, limiting the flexibility and adaptability of application linking processes.
Innovation Solution
An information processing apparatus and medium that allow setting the timing of attribute value input for specific attributes, enabling variable attribute values based on process progress, by separating attributes into automatic-input and in-process-input categories and allowing user configuration through a graphical interface for linking applications.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Adaptability or versatility
If attribute values are set before the start of operation, then the program can be launched to define information for linking business-operation programs, but attributes whose values cannot be set at the start cannot be properly configured
Solution Approach 1:
The system dynamically determines the input timing of attribute values based on process progress. Attributes are categorized into those that can be set before operation start and those that must be set during execution. The system automatically selects the appropriate input timing for each attribute, enabling flexible configuration without requiring manual specification of timing for each attribute.
Solution Approach 2:
The system performs preliminary classification of attributes into two categories: those suitable for pre-operation setting and those requiring in-process setting. This preliminary action enables the system to prepare the configuration structure in advance while reserving the capability to input certain attribute values during execution, thus resolving the contradiction between advance preparation and runtime flexibility.
2Ease of operation
If the system requires all attribute values to be set before operation start, then the configuration process is simplified, but the system cannot handle attributes whose values become available during process execution
Solution Approach 1:
The system implements dynamic attribute value input by automatically determining the optimal input timing for each attribute based on its characteristics and the process progress. This dynamic approach maintains ease of operation through automation while enabling the system to handle both pre-set and runtime attribute values, thus resolving the contradiction between operational simplicity and adaptability.
Solution Approach 2:
The system segments attributes into two distinct groups: those that can be configured before operation start and those that must be configured during execution. This segmentation allows the system to apply different configuration strategies to different attribute types, maintaining ease of operation for static attributes while enabling dynamic handling of runtime attributes.
3Adaptability or versatility
If the system allows flexible timing for attribute value input, then attributes variable in accordance with process progress can be properly configured, but the system complexity increases
Solution Approach 1:
The system employs dynamic timing determination that automatically selects the appropriate input moment for each attribute based on process progress and attribute characteristics. This dynamic approach provides the necessary flexibility for runtime attribute configuration while minimizing system complexity through automated decision-making, eliminating the need for complex manual timing management.
Solution Approach 2:
The system performs self-service by automatically determining the optimal input timing for each attribute without requiring manual specification. This self-service mechanism provides flexible timing adaptation while keeping the system relatively simple, as the system autonomously manages the complexity of timing decisions rather than requiring external configuration for each attribute's timing.
4Productivity
If the system mandates attribute values to be set at fixed timing, then the workflow execution is streamlined, but attributes that require in-process configuration cannot be handled
Solution Approach 1:
The system implements dynamic timing selection that automatically adjusts the attribute value input timing based on process progress and attribute requirements. This dynamic mechanism maintains workflow execution efficiency by automating the timing decision process while enabling the system to handle both pre-operation and in-process attribute configuration, thus resolving the contradiction between streamlined execution and operational flexibility.
Solution Approach 2:
The system performs preliminary classification of attributes to identify which ones require in-process configuration versus pre-operation configuration. This preliminary action enables the system to prepare the workflow structure in advance while reserving specific timing slots for attributes that must be configured during execution, thus maintaining workflow efficiency while enabling adaptive configuration.
Data Source
AI summary
An information processing apparatus includes a processor configured to accept a setting for a timing of an input of an attribute value of a specific attribute when creating a program that runs by linking a first application of a link source and a second application of a link target. The specific attribute is one of attributes handled by the first application or the second application, and the attribute value of the specific attribute is variable in accordance with progress of a process performed by the program.