Dynamic Authentication Challenge System for Fraud Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current user authentication systems in credit/debit card transactions are inadequate in detecting fraudulent activities, leading to liability issues and inconvenience for legitimate users, as they often require additional verification steps that can result in transaction abandonment and lost revenues.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system that stores user preferences as rule-based criteria for authentication challenges, determining and transmitting customized authentication challenges based on transaction type, location, amount, and user preferences, and authenticates users accordingly, integrating issuer and merchant preferences to enhance fraud detection and reduce unnecessary verification steps.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional authentication systems are used to detect fraudulent transactions, then fraud detection capability is improved, but user convenience deteriorates due to additional verification steps causing transaction abandonment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud detection capabilityVSAvoiduser convenience
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically changes authentication parameters (challenge requirements, verification steps) based on transaction risk parameters such as transaction amount, location, device type, and user behavior patterns. Low-risk transactions use simplified authentication while high-risk transactions trigger enhanced verification, resolving the contradiction between fraud detection and user convenience

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The authentication system transitions from static fixed verification steps to dynamic adaptive challenges that adjust in real-time based on risk assessment. The system evaluates transaction context and user responses to determine the appropriate level of authentication challenge, allowing the system to be both secure and convenient depending on conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If simplified authentication processes are used to improve user experience, then transaction completion rate is improved, but fraud detection accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction completion rateVSAvoidfraud detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where authentication responses, transaction outcomes, and risk assessments feed back into the model to refine future authentication decisions. This allows the system to maintain high transaction completion rates while improving fraud detection accuracy over time through learned patterns

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary risk assessment and authentication challenge selection before the actual transaction processing. By pre-evaluating transaction risk factors and preparing appropriate authentication challenges in advance, the system ensures both smooth transaction flow for legitimate users and accurate fraud detection when needed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If multiple authentication challenges are required for high-value transactions, then fraud prevention is improved, but transaction time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud preventionVSAvoidtransaction time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The authentication process is segmented into multiple independent challenges that can be administered sequentially or in parallel. This allows the system to distribute the authentication burden across several smaller steps rather than requiring all verification at once, reducing perceived transaction time while maintaining security

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10878424B2Systems and methods for enhanced user authentication
Publication Date: 2020.12.29 MASTERCARD INT INC
  • US10878424B2 patent drawing
  • US10878424B2 patent drawing
  • US10878424B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method for enhancing user authentication is provided. The method is implemented using an authentication computing device in communication with a memory. The method includes storing a plurality of user preferences associated with a user account. The user preferences are rule-based preferences that define steps to be taken for authenticating the user for accessing the user account. The method also includes receiving an authentication request for access to the user account, determining one or more authentication challenges based, at least in part, on the user preferences, transmitting the one or more authentication challenges to be presented to a user attempting to access the user account, and determining whether to authenticate the user based on a response to the one or more authentication challenges.