Dynamic Authorization Portal for Network Optimization Devices

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current software licensing systems are cumbersome for both customers and providers, as they require manual tracking of authentication codes and do not allow for flexible usage-based licensing, leading to inefficiencies and potential compliance issues. Additionally, existing data optimization techniques in networks require symmetric components and involve costly reconfiguration of physical components.

Innovation Solution

A system for dynamic monitoring and authorization of optimization devices deployed in a network, utilizing a cloud-based portal to manage licenses, track usage, and configure optimization devices, which allows for secure, flexible, and automated license management and data optimization without the need for symmetric components.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional authentication codes are used for software licensing, then software piracy can be prevented, but the licensing process becomes cumbersome and difficult to manage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesoftware licensing securityVSAvoidlicensing process simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically generates, distributes, and validates authentication codes without requiring manual intervention from customers or support staff. The optimization device self-registers with the portal, receives licensing information automatically, and performs self-validation, eliminating the need for customers to manually input and manage complex authentication codes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

A cloud-based portal serves as an intermediary between the software provider and customers. The portal centralizes authentication code management, automatically distributes licensing information to optimization devices, and handles validation requests, simplifying the licensing process for both providers and customers while maintaining security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If fixed-term licenses are provided for optimization devices, then revenue can be guaranteed, but customers pay for unused capacity when usage is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverevenue assuranceVSAvoidlicensing flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The licensing system transitions from static fixed-term licenses to dynamic usage-based licensing. The portal continuously monitors optimization device usage metrics and automatically adjusts licensing status in real-time, allowing customers to pay only for actual usage while ensuring providers receive appropriate revenue based on measured consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where the portal monitors usage metrics from optimization devices, compares them against licensing terms, and automatically sends authorization requests to adjust licensing status. This feedback mechanism enables flexible licensing that adapts to actual usage patterns while maintaining revenue assurance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If physical network components are reconfigured for data optimization, then data transfer efficiency can be improved, but implementation costs and coordination complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata transfer efficiencyVSAvoidnetwork configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces mechanical reconfiguration of physical network components with software-based optimization. Instead of physically reconfiguring switches, routers, and cables to achieve data optimization, the solution uses virtualization and software-controlled optimization devices that can be deployed and configured remotely through the portal, eliminating the need for complex physical network changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates virtual representations and configurations of optimization devices that can be rapidly deployed without physical network changes. The portal manages virtual instances of optimization software that can be instantiated and configured software-defined, replacing the need for physical component reconfiguration while achieving the same data optimization goals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Reliability

If manual tracking of authentication codes is implemented, then licensing compliance can be monitored, but labor costs and error rates increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelicensing complianceVSAvoidlicense tracking automation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The optimization device automatically performs self-registration with the portal, self-reports usage metrics, and self-validates licensing status. The system autonomously generates authorization requests and receives licensing information without requiring manual tracking or intervention, eliminating labor costs and human errors while maintaining compliance monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The portal implements automated feedback mechanisms that continuously monitor optimization device usage, automatically compare it against licensing terms, and trigger authorization requests when compliance status changes. This automated feedback loop replaces manual tracking while ensuring licensing compliance through real-time monitoring and automatic enforcement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11954184B2Dynamic monitoring and authorization of an optimization device
Publication Date: 2024.04.09 HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE DEV LP
  • US11954184B2 patent drawing
  • US11954184B2 patent drawing
  • US11954184B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is a system and method for the monitoring and authorization of an optimization device in a network. In exemplary embodiments, an optimization device transmits an authorization request message to a portal to receive authorization to operate. The portal transmits an authorization response message to the optimization device with capability parameters for operation of the device, including at least one expiration parameter for the authorization. The optimization device sends updated authorization request messages to the portal with its device usage information, such that the portal can dynamically monitor the optimization device and continue to authorize its operation.