Dynamic Backup Policy Adjustment for Media File Reproducibility

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current backup systems for computing devices are inefficient in managing data transfer and storage costs, particularly for mobile devices, as they do not dynamically adjust backup policies based on the difficulty of reproducing media files, leading to unnecessary data transfer and storage requirements.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that dynamically adjusts backup policies by evaluating the difficulty to reproduce media files using objective criteria such as location, subject frequency, and similarity to existing files, prioritizing the backup of hard-to-reproduce files and reducing the backup of easily replaceable ones, thereby optimizing data transfer and storage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If continuous backup of all media files is performed, then data protection is improved, but data transfer costs and storage requirements increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata protectionVSAvoiddata transfer costs
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The backup policy dynamically changes parameters such as backup frequency, priority, and selection criteria based on the difficulty rating of reproducing media files. Files with higher difficulty ratings (harder to reproduce) receive higher backup priority and more frequent backups, while files with lower difficulty ratings receive reduced backup frequency or are excluded from backup. This parameter adjustment resolves the contradiction by optimizing data protection for critical files while reducing unnecessary data transfer for easily replaceable files.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The backup system transitions from a static, uniform backup policy to a dynamic, adaptive policy that continuously evaluates and adjusts backup priorities based on changing conditions. The system dynamically calculates difficulty ratings for each media file based on multiple factors (location, subject, event, quality) and adjusts backup behavior in real-time. This dynamic approach ensures that data protection resources are allocated efficiently, protecting important files while minimizing costs for less critical files.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If backup frequency is increased for all files, then data protection is improved, but bandwidth consumption and transfer time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata protectionVSAvoidtransfer time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The backup system applies different backup frequencies and priorities to different media files based on their individual difficulty ratings. Instead of a uniform backup approach, each file receives a customized backup schedule tailored to its specific characteristics (location, subject, event, quality). This local differentiation ensures that files requiring frequent backups (hard-to-reproduce files) receive appropriate protection, while files that can tolerate less frequent backups do not consume unnecessary bandwidth and transfer time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs backup actions selectively rather than universally. By evaluating the difficulty rating of each media file, the system applies backup actions only where necessary and appropriate. For files with low difficulty ratings (easy to reproduce), the system reduces or eliminates backup actions, thereby avoiding excessive bandwidth consumption and transfer time while maintaining adequate data protection through selective backup of high-difficulty files.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If all media files are backed up with equal priority, then data protection is improved, but storage requirements and transfer costs increase unnecessarily

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata protectionVSAvoidstorage requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The backup policy dynamically changes parameters such as backup frequency, priority, and selection criteria based on the difficulty rating of reproducing media files. Files with higher difficulty ratings (harder to reproduce) receive higher backup priority and more frequent backups, while files with lower difficulty ratings receive reduced backup frequency or are excluded from backup. This parameter adjustment resolves the contradiction by optimizing data protection for critical files while reducing unnecessary data transfer for easily replaceable files.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The backup system transitions from a static, uniform backup policy to a dynamic, adaptive policy that continuously evaluates and adjusts backup priorities based on changing conditions. The system dynamically calculates difficulty ratings for each media file based on multiple factors (location, subject, event, quality) and adjusts backup behavior in real-time. This dynamic approach ensures that data protection resources are allocated efficiently, protecting important files while minimizing costs for less critical files.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10942816B1Systems and methods for dynamically adjusting a backup policy
Publication Date: 2021.03.09 GEN DIGITAL INC
  • US10942816B1 patent drawing
  • US10942816B1 patent drawing
  • US10942816B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosed computer-implemented method for dynamically adjusting a backup policy may include dynamically adjusting a backup policy may include accessing a media file, evaluating an objective criterion of a difficulty to reproduce the media file to generate a difficulty rating, comparing the difficulty rating of the media file to an existing difficulty rating for at least one previous media file, and adjusting a backup policy for the media file based on the comparison of the difficulty rating. Various other methods, systems, and computer-readable media are also disclosed.