Dynamic Bale Creation Through Real-Time Sorting Line Reconfiguration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Sorting facilities face challenges in dynamically reconfiguring their machinery to optimize performance in response to events like jams or changes in material streams, requiring laborious manual adjustments and lacking efficient automated solutions.

Innovation Solution

A cloud-based management control system that collects feedback data from sorting facility devices to dynamically reconfigure their positions and parameters, allowing for real-time optimization of sorting processes without physical modifications, using machine learning models and networked sensors to adjust sorting lines and device configurations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual adjustments are made to retune machines in response to jams or external circumstances, then sorting accuracy can be optimized, but labor requirements and time consumption increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesorting accuracyVSAvoidtime for manual adjustments
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service through automated detection and response mechanisms. Sensors continuously monitor the sorting facility for jams and performance deviations, while the control system automatically adjusts machine parameters and reconfigures sorting lines without human intervention, allowing the system to self-optimize in real-time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where sensors monitor sorting accuracy, jam conditions, and material flow characteristics. This feedback is processed by the control system to dynamically adjust machine settings and reconfigure sorting lines, ensuring optimal performance is maintained through real-time adaptation rather than manual intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If the sorting facility is reconfigured to handle different material streams or optimize for specific conditions, then adaptability improves, but the complexity of managing inter-dependent machines increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedynamic reconfiguration capabilityVSAvoidcomplexity of managing machines
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system serves multiple functions: it monitors sorting accuracy, detects jams, adjusts machine parameters, reconfigures sorting lines, and manages material flow optimization. This universal control platform handles all aspects of facility management through a single integrated system, reducing the complexity of managing multiple specialized control mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically reconfigures the sorting facility by programmatically adjusting machine parameters and physical configurations based on real-time conditions. Sorting lines can be reconfigured, machine speeds adjusted, and capture zones modified on-the-fly to handle different material streams, enabling adaptability without permanent structural changes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If more sensors and control systems are added to enable automated reconfiguration, then productivity and sorting accuracy improve, but device complexity and initial costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethroughput optimizationVSAvoidnumber of sensors and control systems
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges multiple sensing functions and control capabilities into an integrated platform. Sensors for detecting jams, measuring material flow, and monitoring sorting accuracy are combined with control functions for adjusting machines and reconfiguring lines into a unified system, reducing overall complexity through consolidation rather than proliferation of separate components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS20240299953A1Dynamic bale creation
Publication Date: 2024.09.12 AMP ROBOTICS CORP
  • US20240299953A1 patent drawing
  • US20240299953A1 patent drawing
  • US20240299953A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Dynamic bale creation is disclosed, including: a plurality of sorting facility devices configured to capture objects from a material stream based at least in part on target sorting metrics specified by a bale recipe; and one or more processors configured to: determine current sorting metrics associated with captured objects that are to be added to a collection mechanism at a sorting facility; and determine whether to trigger reconfiguration of at least a subset of the plurality of sorting facility devices based at least in part on a comparison between the target sorting metrics and the current sorting metrics.