Dynamic Bandwidth Control for Wireless Interference Avoidance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Expanded channel bandwidth in wireless networks can lead to interference when networks overlap, causing communication errors due to overlapping channel usage, especially when a network controller cannot detect interfering transmissions from neighboring networks.

Innovation Solution

A method where a device monitors narrow channels for potential interference and responds to a Request-to-Send (RTS) with a Clear-to-Send (CTS) that excludes the interfering channel, restricting data transmission to a reduced set of narrow channels, thereby avoiding interference while maintaining some benefits of wide channel usage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If expanded channel bandwidth (40, 80, or 160 MHz) is used to achieve high throughput, then data transmission efficiency is improved, but interference from overlapping networks increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata transmission throughputVSAvoidinterference from overlapping networks
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The wide channel (e.g., 80 MHz) is segmented into multiple narrow 20 MHz channels. When interference is detected on one narrow channel, only that specific channel is excluded while the other narrow channels remain available for transmission, thus maintaining most of the bandwidth while avoiding interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The channel bandwidth is made dynamic rather than fixed. The system can switch between using the full wide channel and using a reduced set of narrow channels based on real-time interference conditions, allowing adaptive optimization of throughput while avoiding interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Device complexity

If a network controller cannot directly detect interfering transmissions, then device complexity is reduced, but communication reliability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterference detection capabilityVSAvoidcommunication reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The mobile device acts as an intermediary that detects interference on narrow channels and communicates this information back to the network controller through the CTS frame. This allows the network controller to make informed bandwidth decisions without requiring direct interference detection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback through the RTS/CTS exchange mechanism. The mobile device monitors narrow channels for interference and provides feedback to the network controller by indicating which narrow channels should be excluded in the CTS frame, enabling reliable communication despite the controller's limited detection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9608795B2Dynamic bandwidth control in interference situations
Publication Date: 2017.03.28 APPLE INC
  • US9608795B2 patent drawing
  • US9608795B2 patent drawing
  • US9608795B2 patent drawing

AI summary

When a wireless communications device intends to communicate with another device over a wide channel consisting of multiple narrow channels, but detects interference on one or more of those narrow channels, it may restrict subsequent communications with that other device to those narrow channels that don't suffer from the interference. In one embodiment the device may simply refuse to monitor the interfering channel(s) for signals for a particular period of time. In another embodiment the device may use a CTS to signal the other device not to use the interfering narrow channel(s). That may result in using a wide channel with a reduced bandwidth for communications.