Image Forming Base Detection for Recording Head Collision Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing image forming technologies are inefficient when changing recording media types, as they require unnecessary adjustments to the base detection range, prolonging preparation time due to fixed detection ranges that include irrelevant height adjustments.

Innovation Solution

An image forming apparatus and method that dynamically adjusts the detection range based on the type of recording medium and base, using sensors to prevent collisions by optimizing the platen position and narrowing the detection range to only areas where collisions are likely, thereby reducing preparation time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the detection range is fixed to cover all possible base heights, then collision prevention is ensured, but the preparation time increases due to unnecessary adjustments in irrelevant ranges

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision preventionVSAvoidpreparation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The detection range is made dynamic rather than fixed. The control unit adjusts the detection range based on the identified base type, expanding it when collision risk is high and contracting it when collision risk is low, thereby optimizing both safety and efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Different detection ranges are applied to different base types. Instead of using a uniform detection range for all bases, the system tailors the detection range to the specific characteristics of each base type, focusing detection resources only where necessary

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If the detection range is narrowed to reduce preparation time, then efficiency improves, but collision detection reliability may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepreparation efficiencyVSAvoidcollision detection reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback from base type identification to continuously adjust the detection range. The control unit receives information about the base type and automatically configures the appropriate detection range, ensuring that the range is never too narrow to detect collisions while minimizing unnecessary detection in safe zones

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The detection range is pre-configured based on the identified base type before image formation begins. This preliminary adjustment ensures that the optimal detection range is already in place when recording media is loaded, avoiding both unnecessary detection time and potential collision risks

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution significantly shortens the preparation time for image formation by optimizing the detection range and preventing collisions, ensuring efficient and timely image processing across different types of recording media.

Implementation Method 1

detect the height of the base with a sensor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSensor detection:

Implementation Method 2

a light receiving device that receives light from the light emitting diode

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight detection: Photoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentEP4331850B1Image forming apparatus and image forming method
Publication Date: 2025.10.01 RICOH CO LTD
  • EP4331850B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4331850B1 patent drawingFigure 2(a)~2(b)
  • EP4331850B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3B

AI summary

An image forming apparatus (20) includes an image forming unit (2001), a base unit (2002), a setting unit (2003), and a detecting unit (2004). The image forming unit (2001) includes a recording head to form an image on a recording medium conveyed in a conveyance direction. The base unit (2002) supports the recording medium and is movable in the conveyance direction. A type of the base unit is changeable according to a type of the recording medium. The setting unit (2003) sets a detection range in the conveyance direction. The detecting unit (2004) detects, before the image is formed, a collision between the recording head and the recording medium on the base unit (2002), in the detection range set by the setting unit (2003).