Dynamic Baseband Unit Deployment for Wireless Network Adaptation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current baseband unit implementations in wireless communication systems are not dynamically adaptable to changing network conditions, leading to suboptimal performance and inefficient resource utilization, as they are often tailored for specific purposes and do not automatically update to meet varying requirements such as energy efficiency or user capacity.

Innovation Solution

A method that involves a set of baseband units with different hardware and software configurations, allowing for the selection and dynamic deployment of a specific unit to serve users based on migration criteria, with identified users ranked according to their service requirements and gradually migrated to the new unit, minimizing service interruptions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If baseband units are disaggregated into multiple implementations with different hardware and software configurations, then system performance and adaptability are improved, but deployment complexity and difficulty of detecting and measuring optimal configurations increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to different network conditionsVSAvoiddeployment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The baseband unit is segmented into multiple distinct implementations (first baseband unit, second baseband unit, etc.), each with different hardware and software configurations. This segmentation allows the system to offer multiple specialized versions that can be deployed based on different network conditions and requirements, thereby improving adaptability while managing complexity through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where the network condition detection unit continuously monitors network conditions and provides this information to the selection unit. This feedback loop enables the system to automatically select the most appropriate baseband unit implementation based on current network conditions, reducing the manual complexity of deployment and configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of manufacture

If baseband units are tailored for specific purposes with fixed configurations, then ease of manufacture and deployment is improved, but adaptability to changing network conditions and user demands deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of deploymentVSAvoidadaptability to changing requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates multiple baseband unit implementations that can serve different purposes and adapt to different network conditions. Each baseband unit is designed with specific hardware and software configurations optimized for particular scenarios, while the overall system architecture allows these units to be selectively deployed based on current needs, achieving both specialization and versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces dynamic selection capability where the selection unit can switch between different baseband unit implementations based on real-time network conditions. This dynamic aspect allows the system to maintain ease of deployment for each individual unit while achieving high adaptability at the system level through flexible configuration and selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If dynamic deployment of baseband units is implemented to adapt to changing conditions, then system performance and adaptability are improved, but service interruptions and loss of time during migration increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedynamic adaptabilityVSAvoidservice interruption time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by detecting network conditions in advance and pre-selecting the most suitable baseband unit implementation before actual deployment is needed. This preliminary detection and selection process allows the system to prepare migration paths ahead of time, reducing unexpected interruptions and minimizing the time required for switching between baseband units.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system maintains continuous service by implementing seamless migration mechanisms between baseband units. The selection unit and migration management unit coordinate to ensure that user connections are maintained during transitions, and the useful action of baseband signal processing continues without significant interruption, thereby reducing loss of time while maintaining dynamic adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS20240334459A1Deployment of baseband units
Publication Date: 2024.10.03 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US20240334459A1 patent drawing
  • US20240334459A1 patent drawing
  • US20240334459A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to a method for processing baseband signals for serving a group of users in a wireless communication system. The method comprises: selecting a specific baseband unit of a set of baseband units which is different from a current baseband unit that serves a group of users. Users of the group of users that fulfil a migration criterion for migration to the selected baseband unit may be identified. The identified users may be ranked according to services accorded by the wireless communication system to the identified users. The selected baseband unit may be controlled to serve, instead of the current baseband unit, the identified users following their order.