Dynamic Basin Model for Drilling Prediction Uncertainty

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current drilling operations face challenges in accurately predicting the characteristics of subterranean formations ahead of the drilling process, leading to uncertainty and inefficiencies in optimizing drilling fluids and processes, which increases costs and risks.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that utilize a combination of basin and compaction models, integrated with geo-mechanical models, to predict subterranean formation characteristics, incorporating real-time, near-real-time, and lag-time sensor data from downhole sensors to reduce estimation uncertainty and optimize drilling parameters.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional basin models are used to predict subterranean formation characteristics, then the prediction can be made, but the estimation uncertainty remains high and calculation time is long (hours)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidcalculation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The basin model is updated dynamically during drilling operations using real-time sensor data from the active borehole. The model transitions from a static pre-drilling prediction tool to a dynamic system that continuously adapts as new data becomes available, reducing both uncertainty and calculation time through iterative refinement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Sensor data collected during drilling operations provides feedback to the basin model, allowing continuous validation and adjustment of predictions. This feedback loop enables the system to reduce estimation uncertainty by comparing predicted characteristics with actual measurements and refining the model accordingly

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If more sensor data and model integration are used to reduce uncertainty, then prediction accuracy improves, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The integrated system serves multiple functions: it collects sensor data, updates the basin model, predicts formation characteristics, and provides drilling recommendations within a single unified platform. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate systems while achieving high prediction accuracy through comprehensive data integration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If real-time sensor data is collected and used to update the basin model, then estimation uncertainty is reduced, but the data processing and model updating complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The basin model is developed and calibrated before drilling operations begin, establishing a baseline framework. This preliminary action allows the model to be ready for rapid updates during drilling without requiring complex real-time calculations, reducing processing complexity while maintaining accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20220316310A1Reducing uncertainty in a predicted basin model
Publication Date: 2022.10.06 HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES INC
  • US20220316310A1 patent drawing
  • US20220316310A1 patent drawing
  • US20220316310A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosure presents processes for updating a prediction for the basin model and compaction model for a borehole. The results of the predicted parameters can be utilized by a drilling controller to adjust a drilling process, such as rotational speed, drilling fluid composition, drilling fluid additives, and other drilling process parameters. The predictions can be updated at various time intervals, such as real-time or near real-time for data collected by downhole sensors and a different time interval for sensor data collected at a lag time, such as cuttings analyzed by surface sensors. Throughout a drilling stage, the drilling process can be updated as new sensor data is received, allowing the uncertainty of the predictions to be reduced as new data is incorporated into the basin and compaction models, thereby enabling an increase in efficiency and optimization of the drilling process.