Dynamic Battery Cell Grouping for Efficient Charge Distribution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing battery charging and discharging systems face challenges in efficiently managing variations among cells, leading to potential overcharging or over-discharging, which can reduce battery reliability and lifespan, and often require complex and costly circuitry to prevent these issues.

Innovation Solution

A system that dynamically selects a subset of cells for charging or discharging based on their individual voltage, impedance, or state of charge, allowing for non-contiguous series connections and bypassing underperforming cells, thereby optimizing cell utilization and avoiding overcharging or over-discharging without the need for lossy or expensive charge-distribution circuitry.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If circuitry is added to charge and discharge cells to their individual capacities, then cell utilization is improved, but device complexity and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecell utilizationVSAvoidcircuit complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The battery pack is divided into multiple cell groups, with each group containing a subset of cells that can be independently managed. This segmentation allows the system to address cell variations by managing smaller groups rather than individual cells, reducing the complexity of control circuitry while maintaining effective cell utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically reconfigures which cells are connected in series by changing the state of switching elements. This dynamic reconfiguration allows the battery management system to adapt to cell variations over time, optimizing charge-discharge cycles without requiring complex dedicated circuitry for each cell.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If charge-shunting circuit is used to protect battery cells, then overcharging is prevented, but energy is wasted and heat is produced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveovercharge protectionVSAvoidenergy waste
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the protection function from traditional charge-shunting circuitry that dissipates energy as heat. Instead, it uses switching elements to selectively disconnect cells from the charge path, redirecting charge only to the cells that need it while bypassing cells that are already charged, thereby preventing energy waste.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Switching elements act as intermediaries between the charge source and individual cells. These switches enable precise control over charge distribution, allowing the system to protect cells from overcharging without the energy-dissipating resistors required by traditional charge-shunting methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Use of energy by moving object

If switched-capacitor or flying-capacitor circuit is used, then charging efficiency is improved, but complicated and costly capacitor and transformer network is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharging efficiencyVSAvoidcapacitor and transformer network
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces expensive, complex capacitor and transformer networks with simpler, more economical switching elements. These switching components achieve efficient charge distribution through direct series/parallel reconfiguration of cells, eliminating the need for bulky and costly energy storage components while maintaining high charging efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

4Device complexity

If subset of electrically adjacent cells is charged and discharged, then simplified circuitry is used, but sub-optimal performance occurs when cells in the middle of the battery fail or degrade

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveswitching network complexityVSAvoidperformance with degraded cells
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The battery is segmented into multiple cell groups that can be independently managed. This segmentation allows the system to bypass degraded or failed cells by reconfiguring which cells are included in active cell groups, ensuring that failures in individual cells do not compromise the entire battery pack's performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically reconfigures cell group compositions based on the state of individual cells. When cells degrade or fail, the switching elements enable the system to adaptively reassign other cells to maintain balanced charge-discharge cycles, ensuring continued optimal performance despite cell failures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS9564763B2High-efficiency battery equalization for charging and discharging
Publication Date: 2017.02.07 THE CHARLES STARK DRAPER LABORATORY INC
  • US9564763B2 patent drawing
  • US9564763B2 patent drawing
  • US9564763B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A non-contiguous group of cells in a battery of cells is selected for charging or discharging the battery.